AI 助理
备案控制台
开发者社区 数据库 关系型数据库 文章 正文

PostgreSQL 9.6 聚合运算180倍性能提升如何做到? 聚合代码优化OP复用浅析

2016-10-08 5450
版权
版权声明：
本文内容由阿里云实名注册用户自发贡献，版权归原作者所有，阿里云开发者社区不拥有其著作权，亦不承担相应法律责任。具体规则请查看《 阿里云开发者社区用户服务协议》和 《阿里云开发者社区知识产权保护指引》。如果您发现本社区中有涉嫌抄袭的内容，填写 侵权投诉表单进行举报，一经查实，本社区将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
本文涉及的产品
云原生数据库 PolarDB 分布式版，标准版 2核8GB
推荐场景：
使用PolarDB-X与Flink搭建实时数据大屏
RDS MySQL Serverless 基础系列，0.5-2RCU 50GB
推荐场景：
学生管理系统数据库设计 搭建个人博客
云数据库 RDS SQL Server，基础系列 2核4GB
推荐场景：
SQL Server性能诊断案例分析
简介： PostgreSQL 9.6 内核优化之 聚合代码优化OP复用浅析 作者 digoal 日期 2016-10-08 标签 PostgreSQL , 9.6 , 内核优化 , 聚合代码优化 , OP复用 背景 聚合操作指将分组的数据聚合为一个结果输出。 聚合通常用在统

PostgreSQL 9.6 内核优化之 聚合代码优化OP复用浅析

作者

digoal

日期

2016-10-08

标签

PostgreSQL , 9.6 , 内核优化 , 聚合代码优化 , OP复用

背景

聚合操作指将分组的数据聚合为一个结果输出。

聚合通常用在统计应用中，例如统计分组的最大值，最小值，记录数，平均值，方差，截距，相关性。

聚合也可能被用于文本分析或者图像分析等，例如最佳相似度，行列变换，聚合为数组或JSON，图像堆叠等。

因此聚合通常需要启动值，行的处理，以及结果的格式转换3个过程。

PostgreSQL的聚合也包含了以上三个过程，创建一个聚合函数的语法如下：

CREATE AGGREGATE name ( [ argmode ] [ argname ] arg_data_type [ , ... ] ) (
    SFUNC = sfunc,
    STYPE = state_data_type
    [ , SSPACE = state_data_size ]
    [ , FINALFUNC = ffunc ]
    [ , FINALFUNC_EXTRA ]
    [ , COMBINEFUNC = combinefunc ]
    [ , SERIALFUNC = serialfunc ]
    [ , DESERIALFUNC = deserialfunc ]
    [ , INITCOND = initial_condition ]
    [ , MSFUNC = msfunc ]
    [ , MINVFUNC = minvfunc ]
    [ , MSTYPE = mstate_data_type ]
    [ , MSSPACE = mstate_data_size ]
    [ , MFINALFUNC = mffunc ]
    [ , MFINALFUNC_EXTRA ]
    [ , MINITCOND = minitial_condition ]
    [ , SORTOP = sort_operator ]
    [ , PARALLEL = { SAFE | RESTRICTED | UNSAFE } ]
)

例子

CREATE AGGREGATE avg (float8)
(
    sfunc = float8_accum,
    stype = float8[],
    finalfunc = float8_avg,
    initcond = '{0,0,0}'
);

参考

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/xaggr.html

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/sql-createaggregate.html

PostgreSQL 聚合处理流程如图

pic1

1. 使用initcond指定internal-state的初始值，没有则为空。    

2. 每条记录(作为next-data-values输入)，调用 sfunc( internal-state, next-data-values ) ---> next-internal-state  
   输出的结果作为中间结果继续调用sfunc

3. ffunc( internal-state ) ---> aggregate-value
   可选，作为结果转换使用

9.6 聚合OP优化

pic2

如果initcond与sfunc一致，在同一个聚合分组内，sfunc只需要计算一遍所有记录，而不需要计算多遍。

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=804163bc25e979fcd91b02e58fa2d1c6b587cc65

Share transition state between different aggregates when possible.

If there are two different aggregates in the query with same inputs, 
and the aggregates have the same initial condition and transition function,
only calculate the state value once, and only call the final functionsseparately. 
For example, AVG(x) and SUM(x) aggregates have the same transition function, which accumulates the sum and number of input tuples.
For a query like "SELECT AVG(x), SUM(x) FROM x", we can therefore accumulate the state function only once, which gives a nice speedup.

David Rowley, reviewed and edited by me.

我们可以通过以下SQL查看可以共享OP的聚合函数，rank一致的都可以共享。

postgres=# select rank() over (partition by 1 order by aggtransfn,agginitval),
           row_number() over (partition by aggtransfn,agginitval order by aggfnoid) rn,
           aggfnoid,aggtransfn,agginitval from pg_aggregate ;
rank rn aggfnoid aggtransfn agginitval
1 1 pg_catalog.sum float4pl none
2 1 pg_catalog.avg float4_accum {0,0,0}
2 2 pg_catalog.variance float4_accum {0,0,0}
2 3 pg_catalog.stddev float4_accum {0,0,0}
2 4 pg_catalog.var_samp float4_accum {0,0,0}
2 5 pg_catalog.stddev_samp float4_accum {0,0,0}
2 6 pg_catalog.var_pop float4_accum {0,0,0}
2 7 pg_catalog.stddev_pop float4_accum {0,0,0}
9 1 pg_catalog.max float4larger none
10 1 pg_catalog.min float4smaller none
11 1 pg_catalog.sum float8pl none
12 1 pg_catalog.avg float8_accum {0,0,0}
12 2 pg_catalog.variance float8_accum {0,0,0}
12 3 pg_catalog.stddev float8_accum {0,0,0}
12 4 pg_catalog.var_samp float8_accum {0,0,0}
12 5 pg_catalog.stddev_samp float8_accum {0,0,0}
12 6 pg_catalog.var_pop float8_accum {0,0,0}
12 7 pg_catalog.stddev_pop float8_accum {0,0,0}
19 1 pg_catalog.max float8larger none
20 1 pg_catalog.min float8smaller none
21 1 pg_catalog.max text_larger none
22 1 pg_catalog.min text_smaller none
23 1 pg_catalog.max array_larger none
24 1 pg_catalog.min array_smaller none
25 1 pg_catalog.max int4larger none
25 2 pg_catalog.max int4larger none
27 1 pg_catalog.min int4smaller none
27 2 pg_catalog.min int4smaller none
29 1 pg_catalog.max int2larger none
30 1 pg_catalog.min int2smaller none
31 1 pg_catalog.sum cash_pl none
32 1 pg_catalog.max cashlarger none
33 1 pg_catalog.min cashsmaller none
34 1 pg_catalog.max bpchar_larger none
35 1 pg_catalog.min bpchar_smaller none
36 1 pg_catalog.max date_larger none
37 1 pg_catalog.min date_smaller none
38 1 pg_catalog.sum interval_pl none
39 1 pg_catalog.min timestamptz_smaller none
40 1 pg_catalog.max timestamptz_larger none
41 1 pg_catalog.min interval_smaller none
42 1 pg_catalog.max interval_larger none
43 1 pg_catalog.count int8inc 0
44 1 pg_catalog.max int8larger none
45 1 pg_catalog.min int8smaller none
46 1 pg_catalog.max time_larger none
47 1 pg_catalog.min time_smaller none
48 1 pg_catalog.max timetz_larger none
49 1 pg_catalog.min timetz_smaller none
50 1 pg_catalog.bit_and bitand none
51 1 pg_catalog.bit_or bitor none
52 1 pg_catalog.min numeric_smaller none
53 1 pg_catalog.max numeric_larger none
54 1 pg_catalog.variance numeric_accum none
54 2 pg_catalog.stddev numeric_accum none
54 3 pg_catalog.var_samp numeric_accum none
54 4 pg_catalog.stddev_samp numeric_accum none
54 5 pg_catalog.var_pop numeric_accum none
54 6 pg_catalog.stddev_pop numeric_accum none
60 1 pg_catalog.variance int2_accum none
60 2 pg_catalog.stddev int2_accum none
60 3 pg_catalog.var_samp int2_accum none
60 4 pg_catalog.stddev_samp int2_accum none
60 5 pg_catalog.var_pop int2_accum none
60 6 pg_catalog.stddev_pop int2_accum none
66 1 pg_catalog.variance int4_accum none
66 2 pg_catalog.stddev int4_accum none
66 3 pg_catalog.var_samp int4_accum none
66 4 pg_catalog.stddev_samp int4_accum none
66 5 pg_catalog.var_pop int4_accum none
66 6 pg_catalog.stddev_pop int4_accum none
72 1 pg_catalog.variance int8_accum none
72 2 pg_catalog.stddev int8_accum none
72 3 pg_catalog.var_samp int8_accum none
72 4 pg_catalog.stddev_samp int8_accum none
72 5 pg_catalog.var_pop int8_accum none
72 6 pg_catalog.stddev_pop int8_accum none
78 1 pg_catalog.sum int2_sum none
79 1 pg_catalog.sum int4_sum none
80 1 pg_catalog.avg interval_accum {0 second,0 second}
81 1 pg_catalog.bit_and int2and none
82 1 pg_catalog.bit_or int2or none
83 1 pg_catalog.bit_and int4and none
84 1 pg_catalog.bit_or int4or none
85 1 pg_catalog.bit_and int8and none
86 1 pg_catalog.bit_or int8or none
87 1 pg_catalog.avg int2_avg_accum {0,0}
88 1 pg_catalog.avg int4_avg_accum {0,0}
89 1 pg_catalog.max oidlarger none
90 1 pg_catalog.min oidsmaller none
91 1 pg_catalog.min timestamp_smaller none
92 1 pg_catalog.max timestamp_larger none
93 1 pg_catalog.array_agg array_agg_transfn none
94 1 bool_and booland_statefunc none
94 2 every booland_statefunc none
96 1 bool_or boolor_statefunc none
97 1 pg_catalog.avg int8_avg_accum none
97 2 pg_catalog.sum int8_avg_accum none
99 1 pg_catalog.max tidlarger none
100 1 pg_catalog.min tidsmaller none
101 1 pg_catalog.count int8inc_any 0
102 1 regr_count int8inc_float8_float8 0
103 1 regr_sxx float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 2 regr_syy float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 3 regr_sxy float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 4 regr_avgx float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 5 regr_avgy float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 6 regr_r2 float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 7 regr_slope float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 8 regr_intercept float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 9 covar_pop float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 10 covar_samp float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
103 11 corr float8_regr_accum {0,0,0,0,0,0}
114 1 pg_catalog.avg numeric_avg_accum none
114 2 pg_catalog.sum numeric_avg_accum none
116 1 xmlagg xmlconcat2 none
117 1 json_agg json_agg_transfn none
118 1 json_object_agg json_object_agg_transfn none
119 1 jsonb_agg jsonb_agg_transfn none
120 1 jsonb_object_agg jsonb_object_agg_transfn none
121 1 pg_catalog.min enum_smaller none
122 1 pg_catalog.max enum_larger none
123 1 pg_catalog.string_agg string_agg_transfn none
124 1 pg_catalog.string_agg bytea_string_agg_transfn none
125 1 pg_catalog.max network_larger none
126 1 pg_catalog.min network_smaller none
127 1 pg_catalog.percentile_disc ordered_set_transition none
127 2 pg_catalog.percentile_cont ordered_set_transition none
127 3 pg_catalog.percentile_cont ordered_set_transition none
127 4 pg_catalog.percentile_disc ordered_set_transition none
127 5 pg_catalog.percentile_cont ordered_set_transition none
127 6 pg_catalog.percentile_cont ordered_set_transition none
127 7 mode ordered_set_transition none
134 1 pg_catalog.rank ordered_set_transition_multi none
134 2 pg_catalog.percent_rank ordered_set_transition_multi none
134 3 pg_catalog.cume_dist ordered_set_transition_multi none
134 4 pg_catalog.dense_rank ordered_set_transition_multi none
138 1 pg_catalog.array_agg array_agg_array_transfn none

我接下来抽取几个数据统计相关的，验证9.6的优化效果

  103 |  1 | regr_sxx                   | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 |  2 | regr_syy                   | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 |  3 | regr_sxy                   | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 |  4 | regr_avgx                  | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 |  5 | regr_avgy                  | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 |  6 | regr_r2                    | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 |  7 | regr_slope                 | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 |  8 | regr_intercept             | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 |  9 | covar_pop                  | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 | 10 | covar_samp                 | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}
  103 | 11 | corr                       | float8_regr_accum            | {0,0,0,0,0,0}

这几个聚合函数的用法如下

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/functions-aggregate.html

Function Argument Type Return Type Partial Mode Description
corr(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes correlation coefficient
covar_pop(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes population covariance
covar_samp(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes sample covariance
regr_avgx(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes average of the independent variable (sum(X)/N)
regr_avgy(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes average of the dependent variable (sum(Y)/N)
regr_intercept(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes y-intercept of the least-squares-fit linear equation determined by the (X, Y) pairs
regr_r2(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes square of the correlation coefficient
regr_slope(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes slope of the least-squares-fit linear equation determined by the (X, Y) pairs
regr_sxx(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes sum(X^2) - sum(X)^2/N ("sum of squares" of the independent variable)
regr_sxy(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes sum(X*Y) - sum(X) * sum(Y)/N ("sum of products" of independent times dependent variable)
regr_syy(Y, X) double precision double precision Yes sum(Y^2) - sum(Y)^2/N ("sum of squares" of the dependent variable)

对比测试

测试5000万条记录

postgres=# create table agg_test(x float8, y float8);
postgres=# insert into agg_test select 10000*random(), 10000*random() from generate_series(1,50000000);

1. 9.6 非并行
聚合计算耗费了7.1秒

postgres=# show max_parallel_workers_per_gather ;
 max_parallel_workers_per_gather 
---------------------------------
 0
(1 row)

postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) select corr(y,x), covar_pop(y,x), covar_samp(y,x), regr_avgx(y,x), regr_avgy(y,x), regr_intercept(y,x), regr_r2(y,x), regr_slope(y,x), regr_sxx(y,x), regr_sxy(y,x), regr_syy(y,x) from agg_test ;
                                                                                            QUERY PLAN                                                                                            
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=2145276.13..2145276.14 rows=1 width=88) (actual time=11703.472..11703.472 rows=1 loops=1)
   Output: corr(y, x), covar_pop(y, x), covar_samp(y, x), regr_avgx(y, x), regr_avgy(y, x), regr_intercept(y, x), regr_r2(y, x), regr_slope(y, x), regr_sxx(y, x), regr_sxy(y, x), regr_syy(y, x)
   Buffers: shared hit=270271
   ->  Seq Scan on public.agg_test  (cost=0.00..770272.36 rows=50000136 width=16) (actual time=0.010..4594.588 rows=50000000 loops=1)
         Output: x, y
         Buffers: shared hit=270271
 Planning time: 0.082 ms
 Execution time: 11703.541 ms
(8 rows)

2. 9.5
聚合计算耗费了36.1秒

postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) select corr(y,x), covar_pop(y,x), covar_samp(y,x), regr_avgx(y,x), regr_avgy(y,x), regr_intercept(y,x), regr_r2(y,x), regr_slope(y,x), regr_sxx(y,x), regr_sxy(y,x), regr_syy(y,x) from agg_test ;
                                                                                            QUERY PLAN                                                                                            
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Aggregate  (cost=2145276.13..2145276.14 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=40563.668..40563.669 rows=1 loops=1)
   Output: corr(y, x), covar_pop(y, x), covar_samp(y, x), regr_avgx(y, x), regr_avgy(y, x), regr_intercept(y, x), regr_r2(y, x), regr_slope(y, x), regr_sxx(y, x), regr_sxy(y, x), regr_syy(y, x)
   Buffers: shared hit=270271
   ->  Seq Scan on public.agg_test  (cost=0.00..770272.36 rows=50000136 width=16) (actual time=0.009..4481.032 rows=50000000 loops=1)
         Output: x, y
         Buffers: shared hit=270271
 Planning time: 0.063 ms
 Execution time: 40563.742 ms
(8 rows)

3. 9.6 并行
聚合计算约耗费0.2秒

postgres=# set max_parallel_workers_per_gather =128;
postgres=# set force_parallel_mode =on;  
postgres=# alter table agg_test set (parallel_workers =32);
postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) select corr(y,x), covar_pop(y,x), covar_samp(y,x), regr_avgx(y,x), regr_avgy(y,x), regr_intercept(y,x), regr_r2(y,x), regr_slope(y,x), regr_sxx(y,x), regr_sxy(y,x), regr_syy(y,x) from agg_test ;
                                                                                                                                                      QUERY PLAN                                                 

 Finalize Aggregate  (cost=329869.02..329869.03 rows=1 width=88) (actual time=456.718..456.718 rows=1 loops=1)
   Output: corr(y, x), covar_pop(y, x), covar_samp(y, x), regr_avgx(y, x), regr_avgy(y, x), regr_intercept(y, x), regr_r2(y, x), regr_slope(y, x), regr_sxx(y, x), regr_sxy(y, x), regr_syy(y, x)
   Buffers: shared hit=275071
   ->  Gather  (cost=329864.90..329868.11 rows=32 width=352) (actual time=456.567..456.612 rows=33 loops=1)
         Output: (PARTIAL corr(y, x)), (PARTIAL covar_pop(y, x)), (PARTIAL covar_samp(y, x)), (PARTIAL regr_avgx(y, x)), (PARTIAL regr_avgy(y, x)), (PARTIAL regr_intercept(y, x)), (PARTIAL regr_r2(y, x)), (PARTIAL regr_slope(y, x)), (PARTIAL regr_sxx(y, x)), (PARTIAL regr_sxy(y, x)), (PARTIAL regr_syy(y, x))
         Workers Planned: 32
         Workers Launched: 32
         Buffers: shared hit=275071
         ->  Partial Aggregate  (cost=328864.90..328864.91 rows=1 width=352) (actual time=451.769..451.769 rows=1 loops=33)
               Output: PARTIAL corr(y, x), PARTIAL covar_pop(y, x), PARTIAL covar_samp(y, x), PARTIAL regr_avgx(y, x), PARTIAL regr_avgy(y, x), PARTIAL regr_intercept(y, x), PARTIAL regr_r2(y, x), PARTIAL regr_slope(y, x), PARTIAL regr_sxx(y, x), PARTIAL regr_sxy(y, x), PARTIAL regr_syy(y, x)
               Buffers: shared hit=270655
               Worker 0: actual time=448.888..448.888 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8265
               Worker 1: actual time=449.881..449.881 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8357
               Worker 2: actual time=450.175..450.176 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8295
               Worker 3: actual time=450.306..450.306 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8357
               Worker 4: actual time=449.567..449.567 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=6844
               Worker 5: actual time=450.467..450.467 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8360
               Worker 6: actual time=450.574..450.574 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=7898
               Worker 7: actual time=450.665..450.665 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8397
               Worker 8: actual time=450.719..450.719 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8084
               Worker 9: actual time=450.922..450.922 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8405
               Worker 10: actual time=451.004..451.004 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=5421
               Worker 11: actual time=451.175..451.175 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8431
               Worker 12: actual time=451.316..451.316 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8276
               Worker 13: actual time=451.457..451.457 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8431
               Worker 14: actual time=451.506..451.506 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8163
               Worker 15: actual time=451.670..451.670 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=7959
               Worker 16: actual time=451.797..451.797 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8428
               Worker 17: actual time=451.875..451.875 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8265
               Worker 18: actual time=451.982..451.982 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8444
               Worker 19: actual time=452.127..452.127 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=7717
               Worker 20: actual time=452.232..452.232 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8450
               Worker 21: actual time=452.331..452.331 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8304
               Worker 22: actual time=452.450..452.450 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8455
               Worker 23: actual time=452.592..452.592 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8367
               Worker 24: actual time=452.679..452.679 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8460
               Worker 25: actual time=452.814..452.815 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8445
               Worker 26: actual time=452.969..452.969 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8465
               Worker 27: actual time=452.999..452.999 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8454
               Worker 28: actual time=453.193..453.193 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8462
               Worker 29: actual time=452.985..452.985 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8437
               Worker 30: actual time=453.482..453.483 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8348
               Worker 31: actual time=453.505..453.505 rows=1 loops=1
                 Buffers: shared hit=8182
               ->  Parallel Seq Scan on public.agg_test  (cost=0.00..285896.04 rows=1562504 width=16) (actual time=0.046..248.331 rows=1515152 loops=33)
                     Output: y, x
                     Buffers: shared hit=270655
                     Worker 0: actual time=0.058..247.983 rows=1526805 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8265
                     Worker 1: actual time=0.047..249.121 rows=1543825 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8357
                     Worker 2: actual time=0.047..249.206 rows=1532355 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8295
                     Worker 3: actual time=0.047..249.914 rows=1543825 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8357
                     Worker 4: actual time=0.069..244.072 rows=1263920 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=6844
                     Worker 5: actual time=0.046..250.046 rows=1544380 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8360
                     Worker 6: actual time=0.047..247.860 rows=1458910 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=7898
                     Worker 7: actual time=0.045..249.471 rows=1551225 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8397
                     Worker 8: actual time=0.047..247.850 rows=1493320 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8084
                     Worker 9: actual time=0.049..249.905 rows=1552705 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8405
                     Worker 10: actual time=0.048..240.578 rows=1000665 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=5421
                     Worker 11: actual time=0.043..249.234 rows=1557515 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8431
                     Worker 12: actual time=0.044..248.830 rows=1528840 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8276
                     Worker 13: actual time=0.046..249.576 rows=1557515 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8431
                     Worker 14: actual time=0.043..248.819 rows=1507935 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8163
                     Worker 15: actual time=0.046..248.303 rows=1470195 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=7959
                     Worker 16: actual time=0.045..249.997 rows=1556960 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8428
                     Worker 17: actual time=0.046..249.282 rows=1526805 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8265
                     Worker 18: actual time=0.043..249.849 rows=1559785 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8444
                     Worker 19: actual time=0.047..247.241 rows=1425425 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=7717
                     Worker 20: actual time=0.043..250.134 rows=1561030 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8450
                     Worker 21: actual time=0.044..249.316 rows=1534020 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8304
                     Worker 22: actual time=0.043..250.169 rows=1561955 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8455
                     Worker 23: actual time=0.045..249.550 rows=1545675 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8367
                     Worker 24: actual time=0.044..250.062 rows=1562880 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8460
                     Worker 25: actual time=0.043..250.298 rows=1560105 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8445
                     Worker 26: actual time=0.043..249.939 rows=1563805 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8465
                     Worker 27: actual time=0.049..250.511 rows=1561770 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8454
                     Worker 28: actual time=0.045..250.523 rows=1563250 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8462
                     Worker 29: actual time=0.049..250.492 rows=1558625 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8437
                     Worker 30: actual time=0.053..247.131 rows=1542160 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8348
                     Worker 31: actual time=0.053..249.789 rows=1511450 loops=1
                       Buffers: shared hit=8182
 Planning time: 0.101 ms
 Execution time: 483.888 ms
(144 rows)

9.6的优化效果很明显，在没有使用并行的情况下，聚合操作已经有约5倍的性能提升。

结果对比

版本 9.6 9.5 9.6并行(32)
5000万记录(11个聚合函数)耗时(秒) 7.1 36.1 0.2

pic3

代码

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=804163bc25e979fcd91b02e58fa2d1c6b587cc65

涉及如下

src/backend/executor/execQual.c     diff | blob | blame | history
src/backend/executor/nodeAgg.c      diff | blob | blame | history
src/backend/executor/nodeWindowAgg.c        diff | blob | blame | history
src/backend/parser/parse_agg.c      diff | blob | blame | history
src/include/nodes/execnodes.h       diff | blob | blame | history
src/include/parser/parse_agg.h      diff | blob | blame | history
src/test/regress/expected/aggregates.out        diff | blob | blame | history
src/test/regress/sql/aggregates.sql     diff | blob | blame | history

小结

在统计学中，大多数的统计算法的中间结果都是可以共用的，例如sum,avg; 方差,相关性,count,sum等运算;

PostgreSQL 9.6很好的抓住了这样的特征，对初始条件一致，中间算法一致的聚合函数，在同一个分组中数据只需要计算一遍，大大降低了CPU的开销，提高了统计效率。

这个思路与LLVM有一些神似的地方，不过LLVM的适用场景更广。

Count

文章标签：
云原生数据库 PolarDB
关系型数据库
PostgreSQL
BI
SQL
移动开发
算法
数据格式
JSON
关键词：
PostgreSQL性能
PostgreSQL复用
PostgreSQL性能提升
PostgreSQL聚合
PostgreSQL op
相关实践学习
使用PolarDB和ECS搭建门户网站
本场景主要介绍基于PolarDB和ECS实现搭建门户网站。
阿里云数据库产品家族及特性
阿里云智能数据库产品团队一直致力于不断健全产品体系，提升产品性能，打磨产品功能，从而帮助客户实现更加极致的弹性能力、具备更强的扩展能力、并利用云设施进一步降低企业成本。以云原生+分布式为核心技术抓手，打造以自研的在线事务型(OLTP)数据库Polar DB和在线分析型(OLAP)数据库Analytic DB为代表的新一代企业级云原生数据库产品体系， 结合NoSQL数据库、数据库生态工具、云原生智能化数据库管控平台，为阿里巴巴经济体以及各个行业的企业客户和开发者提供从公共云到混合云再到私有云的完整解决方案，提供基于云基础设施进行数据从处理、到存储、再到计算与分析的一体化解决方案。本节课带你了解阿里云数据库产品家族及特性。
德哥
目录
相关文章
晚风_END
|
7月前
|
存储 关系型数据库 数据库
postgresql|数据库|提升查询性能的物化视图解析
postgresql|数据库|提升查询性能的物化视图解析
晚风_END
739 0
猫头虎
|
监控 关系型数据库 数据库
《PostgreSQL性能大提升：实用优化技巧》
《PostgreSQL性能大提升：实用优化技巧》
猫头虎
780 0
sunrr
|
4月前
|
缓存 关系型数据库 数据库
PostgreSQL性能
【8月更文挑战第26天】PostgreSQL性能
sunrr
75 1
sunrr
|
3月前
|
缓存 关系型数据库 数据库
如何优化 PostgreSQL 数据库性能？
如何优化 PostgreSQL 数据库性能？
sunrr
151 2
qhhf_地道酬勤
|
2月前
|
存储 关系型数据库 MySQL
四种数据库对比MySQL、PostgreSQL、ClickHouse、MongoDB——特点、性能、扩展性、安全性、适用场景
四种数据库对比 MySQL、PostgreSQL、ClickHouse、MongoDB——特点、性能、扩展性、安全性、适用场景
qhhf_地道酬勤
319 0
sunrr
|
3月前
|
缓存 关系型数据库 数据库
PostgreSQL的性能
PostgreSQL的性能
sunrr
185 2
sunrr
|
4月前
|
缓存 关系型数据库 数据库
PostgreSQL 查询性能
【8月更文挑战第5天】PostgreSQL 查询性能
sunrr
87 8
sunrr
|
4月前
|
关系型数据库 Java 数据库
PostgreSQL性能
【8月更文挑战第5天】PostgreSQL性能
sunrr
124 7
sunrr
|
4月前
|
监控 关系型数据库 数据库
如何优化PostgreSQL的性能？
【8月更文挑战第4天】如何优化PostgreSQL的性能？
sunrr
280 7
yzshover
|
关系型数据库 大数据 PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL16-新特性-并行聚合
PostgreSQL16-新特性-并行聚合
yzshover
152 0
数据库

关系型数据库

热门文章

最新文章

  • 1
    德哥的PostgreSQL私房菜 - 史上最屌PG资料合集
  • 2
    什么场景应该用 MongoDB ？
  • 3
    PostgreSQL 如何实现批量更新、删除、插入
  • 4
    Linux 性能诊断 perf使用指南
  • 5
    PostgreSQL 9种索引的原理和应用场景
  • 6
    PostgreSQL 9.5+ 高效分区表实现 - pg_pathman
  • 7
    时序数据库分析 - TimescaleDB时序数据库介绍
  • 8
    page fault带来的性能问题
  • 9
    MongoDB中使用的SCRAM-SHA1认证机制
  • 10
    Greenplum 通过gpfdist + EXTERNAL TABLE 并行导入数据
  • 1
    【AI应用启航workshop】构建高可用数据库、拥抱AI智能问数
    35
  • 2
    【赵渝强老师】PostgreSQL的参数文件
    51
  • 3
    MySQL进阶突击系列(04)事务隔离级别、AICD、CAP、BASE原则一直搞不懂？ | 看这篇就够了
    41
  • 4
    MySQL进阶突击系列(03) MySQL架构原理solo九魂17环连问 | 给大厂面试官的一封信
    52
  • 5
    卓越效能，极简运维，体验Serverless高可用架构，完成任务可领取转轮日历！
    44
  • 6
    数据库数据恢复—ORACLE常见故障的数据恢复方案
    58
  • 7
    【赵渝强老师】PostgreSQL的控制文件
    70
  • 8
    PolarDB 分布式版 V2.0，安全可靠的集中分布式一体化数据库管理软件
    89
  • 9
    数据库数据恢复—MYSQL数据库文件损坏的数据恢复案例
    63
  • 10
    MySQL常见函数第二期，你都用过哪些呢 ？
    59

    • 相关产品

  • 云原生数据库 PolarDB
    文档详情 产品详情
  • 云数据库 RDS PostgreSQL 版
    文档详情 产品详情

    • 相关课程

    更多
  • PolarDB for PostgreSQL 开源人才初级认证培训课程
  • PolarDB for PostgreSQL 内核解读系列课程
  • 7天突破PolarDB for PostgreSQL 2022版
  • PolarDB for PostgreSQL 入门
  • PostgreSQL云上开发实践
  • PostgreSQL实战进阶

    • 相关电子书

    更多
  • 金融级 PostgreSQL监控及优化
  • PostgreSQL在哈啰的实践-周飞
  • PostgreSQL高并发数据库应用数据

    • 相关实验场景

    更多
  • PolarDB for PostgreSQL 闪回特性体验
  • 函数计算X RDS PostgreSQL，基于LLM大语言模型构建AI知识库
  • 搭建PostgreSQL主从架构
  • 如何开通PostgreSQL的专属集群

    • 推荐镜像

    更多
  • postgresql
  • mysql
  • mongodb
    • 下一篇
    【案例实战】SpringBoot整合阿里云文件上传OSS