HBM内存介绍

简介: 原帖地址:http://www.anandtech.com/show/9969/jedec-publishes-hbm2-specification The high-bandwidth memory (HBM) technology solves two key problems rel...

原帖地址:http://www.anandtech.com/show/9969/jedec-publishes-hbm2-specification

The high-bandwidth memory (HBM) technology solves two key problems related to modern DRAM: it substantially increases bandwidth available to computing devices (e.g., GPUs) and reduces power consumption. The first-generation HBM has a number of limitations when it comes to capacity and clock-rates. However, the second-gen HBM promises to eliminate them.

JEDEC, a major semiconductor engineering trade organization that sets standards for DRAM, recently published the final specifications of the second-generation HBM (HBM2), which means that members of the organization had ratified the standard. The new memory technology builds upon the foundation of the original JESD235 standard, which describes stacked memory devices interconnected using through silicon vias (TSVs) with a very wide input/output (I/O) interface operating at moderate data-rates. The JESD235A will help engineers to further increase performance, capacity and capabilities of HBM memory chips. HBM Gen 2 will be particularly useful for the upcoming video cards by AMD and NVIDIA, which thanks to HBM2 can feature as much as 512 GB/s – 1 TB/s of memory bandwidth and 8, 16 or even 32 GB of memory onboard.

HBM Gen 1: Good, But With Limitations

The original JESD235 standard defines the first-generation HBM (HBM1) memory chips with a 1024-bit interface and up to 1 Gb/s data-rate, which stack two, four or eight DRAM devices with two 128-bit channels per device on a base logic die. Each HBM stack (which is also called KGSD — known good stacked die) supports up to eight 128-bit channels because its physical interface is limited to 1024 bits. Every channel is essentially a 128-bit DDR interface with 2n prefetch architecture (256 bits per memory read and write access) that has its own DRAM banks (8 or 16 banks, depending on density), command and data interface, clock-rate, timings, etc. Each channel can work independently from other channels in the stack or even within one DRAM die. HBM stacks use passive silicon interposers to connect to host processors (e.g., GPUs). For more information about HBM check out our article called “AMD Dives Deep On High Bandwidth Memory — What Will HBM Bring AMD?”.

HBM gen 1 memory KGSDs produced by SK Hynix (the only company that makes them commercially) stack four 2 Gb memory dies and operate at 1 Gb/s data rate per pin. AMD uses these KGSDs with 1 GB capacity and 128 GB/s peak bandwidth per stack to build its Fiji GPU system-in-packages (SiPs) and the Radeon R9 Fury/R9 Nano video cards. The graphics adapters have 4 GB of VRAM onboard, not a lot for 2016. While AMD’s flagship video cards do not seem to have capacity issues right now, 4 GB of memory per graphics adapter is a limitation. AMD’s latest graphics cards sport 512 GB/s of memory bandwidth, a massive amount by today’s standards, but even that amount could be a constraint for future high-end GPUs.

HBM Gen 2: Good Thing Gets Better

The second-generation HBM (HBM2) technology, which is outlined by the JESD235A standard, inherits physical 128-bit DDR interface with 2n prefetch architecture, internal organization, 1024-bit input/output, 1.2 V I/O and core voltages as well as all the crucial parts of the original tech. Just like the predecessor, HBM2 supports two, four or eight DRAM devices on a base logic die (2Hi, 4Hi, 8Hi stacks) per KGSD. HBM Gen 2 expands capacity of DRAM devices within a stack to 8 Gb and increases supported data-rates up to 1.6 Gb/s or even to 2 Gb/s per pin. In addition, the new technology brings an important improvement to maximize actual bandwidth.

One of the key enhancements of HBM2 is its Pseudo Channel mode, which divides a channel into two individual sub-channels of 64 bit I/O each, providing 128-bit prefetch per memory read and write access for each one. Pseudo channels operate at the same clock-rate, they share row and column command bus as well as CK and CKE inputs. However, they have separated banks, they decode and execute commands individually. SK Hynix says that the Pseudo Channel mode optimizes memory accesses and lowers latency, which results in higher effective bandwidth.

If, for some reason, an ASIC developer believes that Pseudo Channel mode is not optimal for their product, then HBM2 chips can also work in Legacy mode. While memory makers expect HBM2 to deliver higher effective bandwidth than predecessors, it depends on developers of memory controllers how efficient next-generation memory sub-systems will be. In any case, we will need to test actual hardware before we can confirm that HBM2 is better than HBM1 at the same clock-rate.

Additional improvements of HBM2 over the first-gen HBM includes lane remapping modes for hard and soft repair of lanes (HBM1 supports various DRAM cell test and repair techniques to improve yields of stacks, but not lane remapping), anti-overheating protection (KGSD can alert memory controllers of unsafe temperatures) and some other.

The second-generation HBM memory will be produced using newer manufacturing technologies than the first-gen HBM. For example, SK Hynix uses its 29nm process to make DRAM dies for its HBM1 stacks. For HBM2 memory, the company intends to use their 21nm process. Thanks to newer manufacturing technologies and higher effective bandwidth, HBM2 should have higher energy efficiency than HBM1 at its data-rates, but we do not have exact details at this point. In any case, HBM2 is likely to be more energy efficient than GDDR5 and GDDR5X, hence the odds are good that it will be the memory of choice for high-end graphics cards in the future.

Samsung Electronics this week said that it had begun mass production of HBM2 memory, but did not reveal too many details. Samsung's HBM2 KGSD features 4 GB capacity, 2 Gb/s data rate per pin and is based on four 8 Gb DRAM dies. The memory chips will let device manufacturers build SiPs with up to 16 GB of memory. It is noteworthy that Samsung decided to use 8 Gb DRAM dies for its HBM2 stacks. Such decision looks quite logical since with 8 Gb DRAM ICs the company can relatively easily increase or decrease capacity of its KGSDs by altering the number of DRAM layers. The DRAM maker uses its 20nm process to produce its HBM2 DRAM KGSDs. Unfortunately, Samsung did not reveal actual power consumption of the new memory stacks.

 

image

HBM2 memory stacks are not only faster and more capacious than HBM1 KGSDs, but they are also larger. SK Hynix’s HBM1 package has dimensions of 5.48 mm × 7.29 mm (39.94 mm2). The company’s HBM2 chip will have dimensions of 7.75 mm × 11.87 mm (91.99 mm2). Besides, HBM2 stacks will also be higher (0.695 mm/0.72 mm/0.745 mm vs. 0.49 mm) than HBM1 KGSDs, which may require developers of ASICs (e.g., GPUs) to install a heat-spreader on their SiPs to compensate for any differences in height between the memory stacks and GPU die, to protect the DRAM, and to guarantee sufficient cooling for high bandwidth memory.

Larger footprint of the second-gen HBM2 means that the upcoming SiPs with multiple memory stacks will require larger silicon interposers, which means that they are going to be slightly more expensive than SiPs based on the first-gen HBM. Since geometric parameters of staggered microbump pattern of HBM1 and HBM2 are the same, complexity of passive silicon interposers will remain the same for both types of memory. A good news is that to enable 512 GB/s of bandwidth, only two HBM2 stacks are needed, which implies that from bandwidth per mm2 point of view the new memory tech continues to be very efficient.


A slide by FormFactor and Teradyne from their presentation at Semiconductor Wafer Test Workshop 2015

Since SK Hynix’s HBM1 KGSDs are smaller than the company’s HBM2 stacks, they are going to have an advantage over the second-gen high-bandwidth memory for small form-factor SiPs. As a result, the South Korea-based DRAM maker may retain production of its HBM1 chips for some time.

New Use Cases and Industry Support

Thanks to higher capacity and data-rates, HBM2 memory stacks will be pretty flexible when it comes to configurations. For example, it will be possible to build a 2 GB KGSD with 256 GB/s of bandwidth that will use only two 8 Gb memory dies. Such memory stack could be used for graphics adapters designed for notebooks or ultra-small personal computers. Besides, it could be used as an external cache for a hybrid microprocessor with built-in graphics (in the same manner as Intel uses its eDRAM cache to boost performance of its integrated graphics processors). What remains to be seen is the cost of HBM2 stacks that deliver 256 GB/s bandwidth. If HBM2 and the necessary interposer remains as expensive as HBM1, it will likely continue to only be used for premium solutions.

Thanks to a variety of KGSD configurations prepared by DRAM manufacturers, expect new types of devices to start using HBM2. Samsung and SK Hynix believe that in addition to graphics and HPC (high-performance computing) cards, various server, networking and other applications will utilize the new type of memory. As of September, 2015, more than 10 companies were developing system-on-chips (including ASICs, x86 processors, ASSPs and FPGAs) with HBM support, according to SK Hynix.

The first-generation HBM memory delivers great bandwidth and energy efficiency, but it is produced by only one maker of DRAM and is not widely supported by developers of various ASICs. By contrast, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, two companies that control well over 50% of the global DRAM output, will make HBM2. Micron Technology yet has to confirm its plans to build HBM2, but since this is an industry-standard type of memory, the door is open if the company wishes to produce it.

Overall, the industry support for the high bandwidth memory technology is growing. There are 10 companies working on SoCs with HBM support, leading DRAM makers are gearing up to produce HBM2. The potential of the second-gen HBM seems to be rather high, but the costs remain a major concern. Regardless, it will be extremely interesting to see next-generation graphics cards from AMD and NVIDIA featuring HBM2 DRAM and find out what they are capable of because of the new Polaris and Pascal architectures as well as the new type of memory.

相关实践学习
部署Stable Diffusion玩转AI绘画(GPU云服务器)
本实验通过在ECS上从零开始部署Stable Diffusion来进行AI绘画创作,开启AIGC盲盒。
目录
打赏
0
0
0
0
7
分享
相关文章
Arthas memory(查看 JVM 内存信息)
Arthas memory(查看 JVM 内存信息)
37 6
JVM简介—1.Java内存区域
本文详细介绍了Java虚拟机运行时数据区的各个方面,包括其定义、类型(如程序计数器、Java虚拟机栈、本地方法栈、Java堆、方法区和直接内存)及其作用。文中还探讨了各版本内存区域的变化、直接内存的使用、从线程角度分析Java内存区域、堆与栈的区别、对象创建步骤、对象内存布局及访问定位,并通过实例说明了常见内存溢出问题的原因和表现形式。这些内容帮助开发者深入理解Java内存管理机制,优化应用程序性能并解决潜在的内存问题。
182 29
JVM简介—1.Java内存区域
JVM实战—2.JVM内存设置与对象分配流转
本文详细介绍了JVM内存管理的相关知识,包括:JVM内存划分原理、对象分配与流转、线上系统JVM内存设置、JVM参数优化、问题汇总。
JVM实战—2.JVM内存设置与对象分配流转
JVM简介—2.垃圾回收器和内存分配策略
本文介绍了Java垃圾回收机制的多个方面,包括垃圾回收概述、对象存活判断、引用类型介绍、垃圾收集算法、垃圾收集器设计、具体垃圾回收器详情、Stop The World现象、内存分配与回收策略、新生代配置演示、内存泄漏和溢出问题以及JDK提供的相关工具。
JVM简介—2.垃圾回收器和内存分配策略
Elasticsearch集群JVM调优设置合适的堆内存大小
Elasticsearch集群JVM调优设置合适的堆内存大小
1086 1
|
3月前
|
JVM: 内存、类与垃圾
分代收集算法将内存分为新生代和老年代,分别使用不同的垃圾回收算法。新生代对象使用复制算法,老年代对象使用标记-清除或标记-整理算法。
44 6
深入探索Java虚拟机(JVM)的内存管理机制
本文旨在为读者提供对Java虚拟机(JVM)内存管理机制的深入理解。通过详细解析JVM的内存结构、垃圾回收算法以及性能优化策略,本文不仅揭示了Java程序高效运行背后的原理,还为开发者提供了优化应用程序性能的实用技巧。不同于常规摘要仅概述文章大意,本文摘要将简要介绍JVM内存管理的关键点,为读者提供一个清晰的学习路线图。
|
6月前
|
JVM内存参数
-Xmx[]:堆空间最大内存 -Xms[]:堆空间最小内存,一般设置成跟堆空间最大内存一样的 -Xmn[]:新生代的最大内存 -xx[use 垃圾回收器名称]:指定垃圾回收器 -xss:设置单个线程栈大小 一般设堆空间为最大可用物理地址的百分之80
|
6月前
|
JVM运行时数据区(内存结构)
1)虚拟机栈:每次调用方法都会在虚拟机栈中产生一个栈帧,每个栈帧中都有方法的参数、局部变量、方法出口等信息,方法执行完毕后释放栈帧 (2)本地方法栈:为native修饰的本地方法提供的空间,在HotSpot中与虚拟机合二为一 (3)程序计数器:保存指令执行的地址,方便线程切回后能继续执行代码
56 3

热门文章

最新文章

AI助理

你好,我是AI助理

可以解答问题、推荐解决方案等