关于阿里云的带宽疑问
上图中都是以本人电信adsl ping的结果，左侧是两台八度的香港云主机，速度差不多，八度国内的主机比香港的不要稍慢一些，不理解，而阿里云是四个里面最慢的，照理都是多线主机，国内的应该比香港的有优势，但结果去完全猜不透，本人试用了众多的主机，其中有72e.net，太平洋，美橙，最后选择了八度，确实比其它家不是高了一个档，最近开始用阿里云，但还是不解为何会是这种结果，可以说得通的是阿里云我用的是1m 的带宽，八度的忘记带宽是多少了，订单信息中也没看到配置的，但千把块一年应该也就是1M-3M之间吧。
写回答
-
2021-05-24 11:12:49赞同 展开评论 打赏 -
Re关于阿里云的带宽疑问7楼的分析很对哦，我确实是在广东哦，当然只是发表一下疑问，并非判断那家公司好那家不好，谢谢大家的积极解答哦2014-08-02 07:35:10赞同 展开评论 打赏
-
-
Re关于阿里云的带宽疑问这个很正常！
楼主应该在广东那边吧，电信ADSL接入，所以ping香港主机延迟最低能达到17ms，如果你是光纤用户，估计只有个位数的延迟
你测试的那个115段的阿里云是在青岛
那个223的国内IP是在安徽
地理位置所导致的延迟大小很正常，而且都是毫秒级的，你能感觉到10毫秒的速度差别？
生活常识都知道广东到安徽肯定比广东到青岛近啊，再加上光纤的部署不可能是直线连接两个城市的，延迟上肯定有差别的2014-08-01 18:23:51赞同 展开评论 打赏 -
不要看这些~没有意思，PING这些，有一半是看自己的网速的~一点意义没有~
能告诉我有啥意义吗？
八度是什么东东？没听过，头一次听说。
选云服务器啊，还是认大牌，不要选那些三六九流的ID商~小心哭死~
-------------------------
顺便说一下，你把八度跟阿里云比好像不合适哦？
感觉有点像QQ跟宝马比，比的有价值吗？-------------------------
回 7楼(high飞起) 的帖子还是你挑出毛病了~顶~2014-08-01 18:14:30赞同 展开评论 打赏 -
我这福建电信ADSL去ping 你的八度香港主机的结果
Microsoft Windows [版本 5.2.3790]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 113.10.238.87 -t
Pinging 113.10.238.87 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=188ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=50
Request timed out.
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=189ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=205ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=50
Request timed out.
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=190ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=191ms TTL=50
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=190ms TTL=50
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=50
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.238.87: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 113.10.238.87:
Packets: Sent = 43, Received = 34, Lost = 9 (20% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 81ms, Maximum = 205ms, Average = 111ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>-------------------------
我相信晚上高峰时段ping值更加惨不忍睹的
-------------------------
上面1个的倒是挺稳定，没有丢包；
Microsoft Windows [版本 5.2.3790]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 113.10.219.180 -t
Pinging 113.10.219.180 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 113.10.219.180: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 113.10.219.180:
Packets: Sent = 72, Received = 72, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 73ms, Maximum = 91ms, Average = 77ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>2014-08-01 18:05:02赞同 展开评论 打赏 -
版权声明：本文内容由阿里云实名注册用户自发贡献，版权归原作者所有，阿里云开发者社区不拥有其著作权，亦不承担相应法律责任。具体规则请查看《阿里云开发者社区用户服务协议》和《阿里云开发者社区知识产权保护指引》。如果您发现本社区中有涉嫌抄袭的内容，填写侵权投诉表单进行举报，一经查实，本社区将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
