Alibaba Cloud Container Service

简介: Virtualization revolutionized business IT. Now containerization is doing it again.

Container_Service_Whitepaper

Virtualization revolutionized business IT. Now containerization is doing it again. Understanding the difference between the two technologies, and learning when to use each of them, is key to improving IT efficiency in an organization of any size.

Containerization is one of the biggest buzzwords in IT right now, and not without good reason. It has the possibility to save a company money and decrease service and product development times. Companies that have yet to investigate the power of containers can do so easily on a single PC or via cloud-based clusters, both of which are easy to set up.

Cloud providers such as Alibaba Cloud o er the ability for customers to create and manage container clusters quickly and cheaply.

If you’re interested in containers then you are not alone. In its Market Guide for Container Management Software1, industry analysts Gartner, predicted that by 2020, more than 50% of global enterprises will be running containerized applications in production, up from less than 20% today.

Another major survey in early 2017 found that 69% of companies are making an investment in containers2, up from 52% in 2016. It also predicts that the proportion of companies investing more than USD $1M in personnel skilled in container technology will double, and the proportion investing more than $500K will triple from 2016 to 2017.

This whitepaper will take a look at the technology and its origins, and discuss some of the benefits of containerization as well as some of the issues and hurdles that early adopters are still encountering.

In practical terms, containerization is an evolution of virtualization and it was specifically designed to solve some of the key problems with virtual machines (VMs). In order to understand containers it helps to have an understanding of virtualization, so that’s where we will start.

目录
相关文章
|
canal 缓存 NoSQL
【Redis系列笔记】双写一致性
本文讨论了缓存不一致问题及其后果,如价格显示错误和订单计算错误。问题主要源于并发和双写操作的异常。解决方案包括使用分布式锁(但可能导致性能下降和复杂性增加)、延迟双删策略(通过延迟删除缓存来等待数据同步)以及异步同步方法,如通过Canal和MQ实现数据的最终一致性。面试中,可以提及这些策略来确保数据库和缓存数据的一致性。
1340 1
【Redis系列笔记】双写一致性
|
机器学习/深度学习
YOLOv5改进 | DAttention (DAT)注意力机制实现极限涨点
YOLOv5改进 | DAttention (DAT)注意力机制实现极限涨点
680 0
Go语言的匿名字段
Go语言支持一种特殊的字段只需要提供类型而不需要写字段名的字段,称之为匿名字段或者嵌套字段。
266 37
Go语言的匿名字段
|
JavaScript
js的三种引用方式
js的三种引用方式
134 2
|
机器学习/深度学习 Python
【初窥CBAM】实操版即插即用的注意力机制模块
【初窥CBAM】实操版即插即用的注意力机制模块
597 0
【初窥CBAM】实操版即插即用的注意力机制模块
|
Arthas Java 测试技术
实战总结,记一次glibc导致的堆外内存泄露
本文记录一次glibc导致的堆外内存泄露的排查过程。
|
Java
SpringBoot关闭过程中是如何销毁一个DisposableBean的?
SpringBoot关闭过程中是如何销毁一个DisposableBean的?
186 0
|
消息中间件 存储 数据采集
FreeRTOS入门教程(任务通知)
FreeRTOS入门教程(任务通知)
612 0
[全民写端]#12绘制ClickGUI
先复制进去FontUtils
261 0