A fine property of the non-empty countable dense-in-self set in the real line
Zujin Zhang
School of Mathematics and Computer Science,
Gannan Normal University
Ganzhou 341000, P.R. China
MSC2010: 26A03.
Keywords: Dense-in-self set; countable set.
Abstract:
Let E⊂\bbR1 be non-empty, countable, dense-in-self, then we shall show that ˉE\bsE is dense in ˉE.
1. Introduction and the main result
As is well-known, \bbQ⊂\bbR1 is countable, dense-in-self (that is, \bbQ⊂\bbQ′=\bbR1); and \bbR1\bs\bbQ is dense in \bbR1.
We generalize this fact as
Theorem 1. Let E⊂\bbR1 be non-empty, countable, dense-in-self, then ˉE\bsE is dense in ˉE.
Before proving Theorem 1, let us recall several related definitions and facts.
Definition 2. A set E is closed iff E′⊂E. A set E is dense-in-self iff E⊂E′; that is, E has no isolated points. A set E is complete iff E′=E.
A well-known complete set is the Cantor set. Moreover, we have
Lemma 3 ([I.P. Natanson, Theory of functions of a real variable, Rivsed Edition, Translated by L.F. Boron, E. Hewitt, Vol. 1, Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., New York, 1961] P 51, Theorem 1). A non-empty complete set E has power c; that is, there is a bijection between E and \bbR1.
Lemma 4 ([I.P. Natanson, Theory of functions of a real variable, Rivsed Edition, Translated by L.F. Boron, E. Hewitt, Vol. 1, Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., New York, 1961] P 49, Theorem 7). A complete set E has the form
\bexE=\sex⋃n≥1(an,bn)c,\eex
where (ai,bi), (aj,bj) (i≠j) have no common points.
2. Proof of Theorem 1。
Since E is dense-in-self, we have E⊂E′, ˉE=E′. Also, by the fact that E″=E′, we see E′ is complete, and has power c. Note that E is countable, we deduce E′\bsE≠\vno.
Now that E′ is complete, we see by Lemma 4,
\bexE′c=⋃n≥1(an,bn).\eex
For ∀ x∈E′, ∀ δ>0, we have
\bee[x−δ,x+δ]∩E′=\sex[x−δ,x+δ]∩(E′\bsE)∪\sex[x−δ,x+δ]∩E.\eee
By analyzing the complement of [x−δ,x+δ]∩(E′\bsE), we see [x−δ,x+δ]∩E′ (minus \sedx−δ if x−δ equals some an, and minus \sedx+δ if x+δ equals some bn) is compelete, thus has power c. Due to the fact that E is countable, we deduce from (???) that
\bex[x−δ,x+δ]∩(E′\bsE)≠\vno.\eex
This completes the proof of Theorem 1.