Android系统在MarshMallow之前,权限都是在安装的时候授予的,虽然在4.3时,Google就试图在源码里面引入AppOpsManager来达到动态控制权限的目的,但由于不太成熟,在Release版本中都是把这个功能给隐藏掉的。在6.0之后,Google为了简化安装流程且方便用户控制权限,正式引入了runtime-permission,允许用户在运行的时候动态控制权限。对于开发而言就是将targetSdkVersion设置为23,并且在相应的时机动态申请权限,在适配了Android6.0的App运行在Android 6.0+的手机上时,就会调用6.0相关的API,不过在低版本的手机上,仍然是按安装时权限处理。
AppOpsManager动态权限管理:官方预演的权限管理
AppOpsManager是Google在Android4.3引入的动态权限管理方式,不过,Google觉得不成熟,所以在每个发行版的时候,总是会将这个功能给屏蔽掉。该功能跟国内的权限动态管理表现类似,这里用CyanogenMod12里面的实现讲述一下,(国内的ROM源码拿不到,不过从表现来看,实现应该类似)。AppOpsManager实现的动态管理的本质是:将鉴权放在每个服务内部,比如,如果App要申请定位权限,定位服务LocationManagerService会向AppOpsService查询是否授予了App定位权限,如果需要授权,就弹出一个系统对话框让用户操作,并根据用户的操作将结果持久化在文件中,如果在Setting里设置了响应的权限,也会去更新相应的权限操作持久化文件/data/system/appops.xml,下次再次申请服务的时候,服务会再次鉴定权限。
举个栗子-定位服务LocationManagerService: CM12源码
App在使用定位服务的时候,一般是通过LocationManager的requestLocationUpdates获取定位,其实是通过Binder请求LocationManagerService去定位。
/android/location/LocationManager.java
private void requestLocationUpdates(LocationRequest request, LocationListener listener, Looper looper, PendingIntent intent) { ... try { mService.requestLocationUpdates(request, transport, intent, packageName); ...
/com/android/server/LocationManagerService.java
@Override public void requestLocationUpdates(LocationRequest request, ILocationListener listener, PendingIntent intent, String packageName) { if (request == null) request = DEFAULT_LOCATION_REQUEST; checkPackageName(packageName); <!--关键函数 1 ,查询Manifest文件,是否进行了权限声明 --> int allowedResolutionLevel = getCallerAllowedResolutionLevel(); checkResolutionLevelIsSufficientForProviderUse(allowedResolutionLevel, request.getProvider()); 。。。 <!--获取调用app的pid跟uid--> final int pid = Binder.getCallingPid(); final int uid = Binder.getCallingUid(); // providers may use public location API's, need to clear identity long identity = Binder.clearCallingIdentity(); try { <!--关键函数 2 检查是否动态授权了权限,或者拒绝了权限--> checkLocationAccess(uid, packageName, allowedResolutionLevel); synchronized (mLock) { Receiver receiver = checkListenerOrIntentLocked(listener, intent, pid, uid, packageName, workSource, hideFromAppOps); if (receiver != null) { requestLocationUpdatesLocked(sanitizedRequest, receiver, pid, uid, packageName); } } } finally { Binder.restoreCallingIdentity(identity); } }
getCallerAllowedResolutionLevel主要通过调用getAllowedResolutionLevel查询APP是否在Manifest中进行了声明
private int getCallerAllowedResolutionLevel() { return getAllowedResolutionLevel(Binder.getCallingPid(), Binder.getCallingUid()); } private int getAllowedResolutionLevel(int pid, int uid) { if (mContext.checkPermission(android.Manifest.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, pid, uid) == PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) { return RESOLUTION_LEVEL_FINE; } else if (mContext.checkPermission(android.Manifest.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, pid, uid) == PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) { return RESOLUTION_LEVEL_COARSE; } else { return RESOLUTION_LEVEL_NONE; } }
checkLocationAccess这里才是动态鉴权的入口,在checkLocationAccess函数中,会调用mAppOps.checkOp去鉴权,mAppOps就是AppOpsManager实例,
boolean checkLocationAccess(int uid, String packageName, int allowedResolutionLevel) { int op = resolutionLevelToOp(allowedResolutionLevel); if (op >= 0) { int mode = mAppOps.checkOp(op, uid, packageName); if (mode != AppOpsManager.MODE_ALLOWED && mode != AppOpsManager.MODE_ASK ) { return false; } } return true; }
进而通过Binder向AppOpsService服务发送鉴权请求
public int noteOp(int op, int uid, String packageName) { try { int mode = mService.noteOperation(op, uid, packageName); if (mode == MODE_ERRORED) { throw new SecurityException(buildSecurityExceptionMsg(op, uid, packageName)); } return mode; } catch (RemoteException e) { } return MODE_IGNORED; }
AppOpsService负责动态权限的鉴定跟更新,接着看noteOperation代码
@Override public int noteOperation(int code, int uid, String packageName) { final Result userDialogResult; verifyIncomingUid(uid); verifyIncomingOp(code); synchronized (this) { Ops ops = getOpsLocked(uid, packageName, true); ... <!--关键点 1--> if (switchOp.mode == AppOpsManager.MODE_IGNORED || switchOp.mode == AppOpsManager.MODE_ERRORED) { op.rejectTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); op.ignoredCount++; return switchOp.mode; <!--关键点 2--> } else if(switchOp.mode == AppOpsManager.MODE_ALLOWED) { op.time = System.currentTimeMillis(); op.rejectTime = 0; op.allowedCount++; return AppOpsManager.MODE_ALLOWED; } else { op.noteOpCount++; <!--关键函数 3--> userDialogResult = askOperationLocked(code, uid, packageName, switchOp); } } return userDialogResult.get(); }
在上面的代码里面,1、2是对已经处理过的场景直接返回已授权,或者已经拒绝,而3就是我们常见授权入口对话框,这里是统一在AppOpsServie中进行授权处理的。
askOperationLocked会显示一个系统对话框,用户选择授权或者拒绝后,AppOpsServie会将选择记录在案,并通知申请服务提供或者拒绝服务。askOperationLocked通过mHandler发送鉴权Message,看一下实现其实就是新建了一个PermissionDialog授权对话框,并且将AppOpsService的引用传了进去,授权后会通过mService.notifyOperation通知授权结果。
mHandler = new Handler() { public void handleMessage(Message msg) { switch (msg.what) { case SHOW_PERMISSION_DIALOG: { HashMap<String, Object> data = (HashMap<String, Object>) msg.obj; synchronized (this) { Op op = (Op) data.get("op"); Result res = (Result) data.get("result"); op.dialogResult.register(res); if(op.dialogResult.mDialog == null) { Integer code = (Integer) data.get("code"); Integer uid = (Integer) data.get("uid"); String packageName = (String) data.get("packageName"); Dialog d = new PermissionDialog(mContext, AppOpsService.this, code, uid, packageName); op.dialogResult.mDialog = (PermissionDialog)d; d.show(); } } }break; } } };
AppOpsManager动态权限管理流程
Android发行版源码对于动态权限管理的支持(几乎为零)
在Android4.3到5.1之间,虽然App可以获得AppOpsManager的实例,但是真正动态操作权限的接口setMode却被隐藏,如下
/** @hide */ public void setMode(int code, int uid, String packageName, int mode) { try { mService.setMode(code, uid, packageName, mode); } catch (RemoteException e) { } }
遍历源码也只有NotificationManagerService这个系统应用使用了setMode,也就是说发行版,只有通知是通过系统的通知管理进行动态管理的。
public void setNotificationsEnabledForPackage(String pkg, int uid, boolean enabled) { checkCallerIsSystem(); Slog.v(TAG, (enabled?"en":"dis") + "abling notifications for " + pkg); mAppOps.setMode(AppOpsManager.OP_POST_NOTIFICATION, uid, pkg, enabled ? AppOpsManager.MODE_ALLOWED : AppOpsManager.MODE_IGNORED); // Now, cancel any outstanding notifications that are part of a just-disabled app if (ENABLE_BLOCKED_NOTIFICATIONS && !enabled) { cancelAllNotificationsInt(pkg, 0, 0, true, UserHandle.getUserId(uid)); } }
对于6.0以下的手机权限如何检测
对于Android6.0以下的手机,不需要关心targetVersion。先说个自己验证的结果:基本没法检测,同时也不需要检测,就算检测出来也没有多大意义,因为,触发时机是在真正的调用服务时候。对于4.3到6.0之前的国产ROM,虽然采用AppopsManagerService,但是并未按照Google的模型对所有权限进行适配,在这个模型下,也就适配了两个权限,(悬浮窗还不一定有)
- 通知权限 public static final int OP_POST_NOTIFICATION = 11;
- 悬浮窗权限 public static final int OP_SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW = 24;
Google发行版的APPOpsService,基本是把整个鉴权逻辑给屏蔽了,通过CM的源码,课对这部分代码窥探一斑,如果整个权限都采用4.3权限管理模型,在拒绝一项权限的时候,这个操作会被持久化到appops.xml中去,但是具体看下去,其实并不是如此,这种机制只对以上两个权限生效:
<pkg n="com.xxx"> <uid n="10988"> <!--关键点1--> <op n="11" m="1" t="1513145979969" r="1521550658067" /> <op n="12" t="1521550651593" /> <op n="29" t="1521550682769" /> <pkg n="com.wandoujia.phoenix2.usbproxy"> <uid n="10969"> <op n="4" t="1517279031173" /> <!--关键点2--> <op n="11" m="1" t="1510889291834" r="1517279030708" /> <op n="14" t="1517293452801" /> <!--关键点3--> <op n="24" m="1" /> <op n="40" t="1513599239364" d="600011" />
国产rom中,假如你拒绝授权位置权限,按照AppOpsService模型,该操作应该被持久化到appops.xml中去,但是,结果并非如此,也就是说,对于其他权限,国产ROM应该是自己糊弄了一套持久管理,持久化Android系统API无法访问的地方,仅仅为自身ROM可见。appops.xml真正被系统使用时从Android6.0开始,其实Android6.0是有两套权限管理的,这其实很混乱,不知道Google怎么想的,不过6.0似乎也有漏洞:权限的授予跟回收权限好像并不配对。
那么这就带来了一个问题,在Android4.3到Android6.0之间的版本,并没有同一个API来检测是否获取了某种权限,因为你动态更新的权限并未持久化到appops.xml中去。对于Android6.0之前的ROM,虽然不能检测,但完全可以直接用服务,不会崩溃,因为如果真需要鉴权,它的鉴权时机其实是在服务使用的时候。AppopsManager在6.0之前,只能用来检测通知,可能还有悬浮窗。
Android 6.0权限管理原理
Android6.0的runtime-permission机制让用户在任何时候都可以取消授权,因此,每次在申请系统服务的时候,都要动态查询是否获取了相应的权限,如果没有获取,就需要动态去申请,首先先看一下权限的查询:
Android6.0权限查询
support-v4兼容包里面提供了一个工具类PermissionChecker,可以用来检查权限获取情况。
PermissionChecker
public static int checkPermission(@NonNull Context context, @NonNull String permission, int pid, int uid, String packageName) { if (context.checkPermission(permission, pid, uid) == PackageManager.PERMISSION_DENIED) { return PERMISSION_DENIED; } String op = AppOpsManagerCompat.permissionToOp(permission); if (op == null) { return PERMISSION_GRANTED; } if (packageName == null) { String[] packageNames = context.getPackageManager().getPackagesForUid(uid); if (packageNames == null || packageNames.length <= 0) { return PERMISSION_DENIED; } packageName = packageNames[0]; } if (AppOpsManagerCompat.noteProxyOp(context, op, packageName) != AppOpsManagerCompat.MODE_ALLOWED) { return PERMISSION_DENIED_APP_OP; } return PERMISSION_GRANTED; }
这里我们只关心context.checkPermission,从上面对于4.3-5.1的APPOpsManager的分析,我们知道AppOpsManagerCompat本身的一些操作对于权限管理并没有实际意义,只是用来做一些标记,最多就是对于通知权限有些用,接下来看checkPermission:
ContextImple.java
/** @hide */ @Override public int checkPermission(String permission, int pid, int uid, IBinder callerToken) { if (permission == null) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("permission is null"); } try { return ActivityManagerNative.getDefault().checkPermissionWithToken( permission, pid, uid, callerToken); } catch (RemoteException e) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_DENIED; } }
接着往下看
ActivityManagerNative.java
public int checkPermission(String permission, int pid, int uid) throws RemoteException { Parcel data = Parcel.obtain(); Parcel reply = Parcel.obtain(); data.writeInterfaceToken(IActivityManager.descriptor); data.writeString(permission); data.writeInt(pid); data.writeInt(uid); mRemote.transact(CHECK_PERMISSION_TRANSACTION, data, reply, 0); reply.readException(); int res = reply.readInt(); data.recycle(); reply.recycle(); return res; }
ActivityManagerService
public int checkPermission(String permission, int pid, int uid) { if (permission == null) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_DENIED; } return checkComponentPermission(permission, pid, UserHandle.getAppId(uid), -1, true); }
进而调用ActivityManager.checkComponentPermission,调用AppGlobals.getPackageManager().checkUidPermission(permission, uid);
ActivityManager.java
/** @hide */ public static int checkComponentPermission(String permission, int uid, int owningUid, boolean exported) { // Root, system server get to do everything. <!--root及System能获取所有权限--> if (uid == 0 || uid == Process.SYSTEM_UID) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED; } 。。。 <!--普通的权限查询--> try { return AppGlobals.getPackageManager() .checkUidPermission(permission, uid); } catch (RemoteException e) { // Should never happen, but if it does... deny! Slog.e(TAG, "PackageManager is dead?!?", e); } return PackageManager.PERMISSION_DENIED; }
最终调用PackageManagerService.java去查看是否有权限,到这里,我们只需要知道权限的查询其实是通过PKMS来进行的。心里先有个底,权限的更新,持久化,恢复都是通过PKMS来进行的。
PKMS不同版本的权限查询
Android5.0的checkUidPermission
public int checkUidPermission(String permName, int uid) { final boolean enforcedDefault = isPermissionEnforcedDefault(permName); synchronized (mPackages) { <!--PackageManagerService.Setting.mUserIds数组中,根据uid查找uid(也就是package)的权限列表--> Object obj = mSettings.getUserIdLPr(UserHandle.getAppId(uid)); if (obj != null) { GrantedPermissions gp = (GrantedPermissions)obj; if (gp.grantedPermissions.contains(permName)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED; } } else { <!--mSystemPermissions记录一些系统级的应用的 uid 对应的 permission-> HashSet<String> perms = mSystemPermissions.get(uid); if (perms != null && perms.contains(permName)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED; } } if (!isPermissionEnforcedLocked(permName, enforcedDefault)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED; } } return PackageManager.PERMISSION_DENIED; }
Android6.0+的checkUidPermission
@Override public int checkUidPermission(String permName, int uid) { final int userId = UserHandle.getUserId(uid); if (!sUserManager.exists(userId)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_DENIED; } synchronized (mPackages) { Object obj = mSettings.getUserIdLPr(UserHandle.getAppId(uid)); if (obj != null) { final SettingBase ps = (SettingBase) obj; final PermissionsState permissionsState = ps.getPermissionsState(); if (permissionsState.hasPermission(permName, userId)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED; } // Special case: ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION permission includes ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION if (Manifest.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION.equals(permName) && permissionsState .hasPermission(Manifest.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, userId)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED; } } else { ArraySet<String> perms = mSystemPermissions.get(uid); if (perms != null) { if (perms.contains(permName)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED; } if (Manifest.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION.equals(permName) && perms .contains(Manifest.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED; } } } } return PackageManager.PERMISSION_DENIED; }
可以看到Android6.0之后,对权限的操作是PermissionsState
PermissionsState.java (android-6.0\frameworks\base\services\core\java\com\android\server\pm)
public boolean hasPermission(String name, int userId) { enforceValidUserId(userId); if (mPermissions == null) { return false; } PermissionData permissionData = mPermissions.get(name); return permissionData != null && permissionData.isGranted(userId); }
从上面的代码可以很清晰看出,6.0之后,除了声明了权限之外,还必须是授权了的。运行时权限跟install权限有所不同,对于install权限isGranted一直返回是True,这里先不必深究PermissionsState是怎么存进内存,先记住,后面会将讲。
权限检查流程
Android6.0动态申请权限
申请权限可以通过V4包里面的ActivityCompat,它已经对不同版本做了兼容
ActivityCompat.java
public static void requestPermissions(final @NonNull Activity activity, final @NonNull String[] permissions, final int requestCode) { if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 23) { ActivityCompatApi23.requestPermissions(activity, permissions, requestCode); } else if (activity instanceof OnRequestPermissionsResultCallback) { Handler handler = new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()); handler.post(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { final int[] grantResults = new int[permissions.length]; PackageManager packageManager = activity.getPackageManager(); String packageName = activity.getPackageName(); final int permissionCount = permissions.length; for (int i = 0; i < permissionCount; i++) { grantResults[i] = packageManager.checkPermission( permissions[i], packageName); } ((OnRequestPermissionsResultCallback) activity).onRequestPermissionsResult( requestCode, permissions, grantResults); } }); } }
可以看到,如果是6.0以下,直接通过PKMS查询是否在Manifest里面申请了权限,并把查询结果通过onRequestPermissionsResult回调传给Activity或者Fragment。其实这里只要在Manifest中声明了,就会默认是Granted。接着往下看:ActivityCompatApi23最终会调用activity.requestPermissions去请求权限。
Activity
public final void requestPermissions(@NonNull String[] permissions, int requestCode) { Intent intent = getPackageManager().buildRequestPermissionsIntent(permissions); startActivityForResult(REQUEST_PERMISSIONS_WHO_PREFIX, intent, requestCode, null); }
Intent其实是通过PackageManager(ApplicationPackageManager实现类)获取的Intent
public Intent buildRequestPermissionsIntent(@NonNull String[] permissions) { if (ArrayUtils.isEmpty(permissions)) { throw new NullPointerException("permission cannot be null or empty"); } Intent intent = new Intent(ACTION_REQUEST_PERMISSIONS); intent.putExtra(EXTRA_REQUEST_PERMISSIONS_NAMES, permissions); intent.setPackage(getPermissionControllerPackageName()); return intent; }
这里首先是隐式的获取授权Activity组件相关信息(GrantPermissionsActivity),其实就是对话框样式的授权Activity,它是PackageInstaller系统应用里面的一个Activity。这里的getPermissionControllerPackageName其实就是获取相应的包名,
ApplicationPackageManager.java (android-6.0\frameworks\base\core\java\android\app)
@Override public String getPermissionControllerPackageName() { synchronized (mLock) { if (mPermissionsControllerPackageName == null) { try { mPermissionsControllerPackageName = mPM.getPermissionControllerPackageName(); } catch (RemoteException e) { throw new RuntimeException("Package manager has died", e); } } return mPermissionsControllerPackageName; } }
最终通过PackageManagerService获取包名
PackageManagerService.java (android-6.0\frameworks\base\services\core\java\com\android\server\pm)
@Override public String getPermissionControllerPackageName() { synchronized (mPackages) { return mRequiredInstallerPackage; } }
mRequiredInstallerPackage这个变量具体赋值是在PMS的构造器中:对于原生Android 6.0,权限管理的APP跟安装器是同一个
mRequiredInstallerPackage = getRequiredInstallerLPr();
这里会得到PackageInstaller应用的相关信息,PackageInstaller负责应用的安装与卸载,里面还包含了对授权管理的一些逻辑。startActivityForResult启动的就是PackageInstaller中的GrantPermissionsActivity,该Activity主要负责权限的授予工作。
<activity android:name=".permission.ui.GrantPermissionsActivity" android:configChanges="orientation|keyboardHidden|screenSize" android:excludeFromRecents="true" android:theme="@style/GrantPermissions"> <intent-filter> <action android:name="android.content.pm.action.REQUEST_PERMISSIONS" /> <category android:name="android.intent.category.DEFAULT" /> </intent-filter> </activity>
这是一个类似于对话框的悬浮窗样式的Activity
<style name="GrantPermissions" parent="Settings"> <item name="android:windowIsFloating">true</item> <item name="android:windowElevation">@dimen/action_dialog_z</item> <item name="android:windowSwipeToDismiss">false</item> </style>
之后就是动态更新权限流程:
权限申请流程
如何动态更新RuntimePermission
通过上面的流程,我们进入了GrantPermissionsActivity,在这个Activity里面,如果一开始没有获得权限,就会弹出权限申请对话框,根据用户的操作去更新PKMS中的权限信息,同时将更新的结构持久化到runtime-permissions.xml中去。
GrantPermissionsActivity
GrantPermissionsActivity其实是利用GroupState对象与PKMS通信,远程更新权限的,当然,如果权限都已经授予了,那么就不需要再次弹出权限申请对话框。
public class GrantPermissionsActivity extends OverlayTouchActivity implements GrantPermissionsViewHandler.ResultListener { private LinkedHashMap<String, GroupState> mRequestGrantPermissionGroups = new LinkedHashMap<>(); .... @Override public void onPermissionGrantResult(String name, boolean granted, boolean doNotAskAgain) { GroupState groupState = mRequestGrantPermissionGroups.get(name); if (groupState.mGroup != null) { if (granted) { <!--权限更新时机--> groupState.mGroup.grantRuntimePermissions(doNotAskAgain); groupState.mState = GroupState.STATE_ALLOWED; } else { groupState.mGroup.revokeRuntimePermissions(doNotAskAgain); groupState.mState = GroupState.STATE_DENIED; } updateGrantResults(groupState.mGroup); } if (!showNextPermissionGroupGrantRequest()) { setResultAndFinish(); } }
具体更新流程:
public boolean grantRuntimePermissions(boolean fixedByTheUser, String[] filterPermissions) { final int uid = mPackageInfo.applicationInfo.uid; // We toggle permissions only to apps that support runtime // permissions, otherwise we toggle the app op corresponding // to the permission if the permission is granted to the app. for (Permission permission : mPermissions.values()) { if (filterPermissions != null && !ArrayUtils.contains(filterPermissions, permission.getName())) { continue; } ... <!--一些关键点--> // Grant the permission if needed. if (!permission.isGranted()) { permission.setGranted(true); mPackageManager.grantRuntimePermission(mPackageInfo.packageName, permission.getName(), mUserHandle); } // Update the permission flags. if (!fixedByTheUser) { // Now the apps can ask for the permission as the user // no longer has it fixed in a denied state. if (permission.isUserFixed() || permission.isUserSet()) { permission.setUserFixed(false); permission.setUserSet(true); mPackageManager.updatePermissionFlags(permission.getName(), mPackageInfo.packageName, PackageManager.FLAG_PERMISSION_USER_FIXED | PackageManager.FLAG_PERMISSION_USER_SET, 0, mUserHandle);
可以看到最终还是调用PackageManager去更新App的运行时权限,最终走进PackageManagerService服务,
PackageManagerService
@Override public void grantRuntimePermission(String packageName, String name, final int userId) { if (!sUserManager.exists(userId)) { Log.e(TAG, "No such user:" + userId); return; } ...一些检查 mContext.enforceCallingOrSelfPermission( android.Manifest.permission.GRANT_RUNTIME_PERMISSIONS, "grantRuntimePermission"); enforceCrossUserPermission(Binder.getCallingUid(), userId, true /* requireFullPermission */, true /* checkShell */, "grantRuntimePermission"); 。。。。。 ... uid = UserHandle.getUid(userId, pkg.applicationInfo.uid); sb = (SettingBase) pkg.mExtras; if (sb == null) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unknown package: " + packageName); } final PermissionsState permissionsState = sb.getPermissionsState(); ... ...授权 final int result = permissionsState.grantRuntimePermission(bp, userId); switch (result) { case PermissionsState.PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE: { return; } case PermissionsState.PERMISSION_OPERATION_SUCCESS_GIDS_CHANGED: { final int appId = UserHandle.getAppId(pkg.applicationInfo.uid); mHandler.post(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { killUid(appId, userId, KILL_APP_REASON_GIDS_CHANGED); } }); } break; } mOnPermissionChangeListeners.onPermissionsChanged(uid); <!--持久化--> // Not critical if that is lost - app has to request again. mSettings.writeRuntimePermissionsForUserLPr(userId, false); }
private static void enforceDeclaredAsUsedAndRuntimeOrDevelopmentPermission(PackageParser.Package pkg, BasePermission bp) { int index = pkg.requestedPermissions.indexOf(bp.name); if (index == -1) { throw new SecurityException("Package " + pkg.packageName + " has not requested permission " + bp.name); } if (!bp.isRuntime() && !bp.isDevelopment()) { throw new SecurityException("Permission " + bp.name + " is not a changeable permission type"); } }
首先要更新内存中的权限授予情况
PermissionsState.java
private int grantPermission(BasePermission permission, int userId) { if (hasPermission(permission.name, userId)) { return PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE; } final boolean hasGids = !ArrayUtils.isEmpty(permission.computeGids(userId)); final int[] oldGids = hasGids ? computeGids(userId) : NO_GIDS; PermissionData permissionData = ensurePermissionData(permission); if (!permissionData.grant(userId)) { return PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE; } if (hasGids) { final int[] newGids = computeGids(userId); if (oldGids.length != newGids.length) { return PERMISSION_OPERATION_SUCCESS_GIDS_CHANGED; } } return PERMISSION_OPERATION_SUCCESS; }
private PermissionData ensurePermissionData(BasePermission permission) { if (mPermissions == null) { mPermissions = new ArrayMap<>(); } PermissionData permissionData = mPermissions.get(permission.name); if (permissionData == null) { permissionData = new PermissionData(permission); mPermissions.put(permission.name, permissionData); } return permissionData; }
下一步,要将更新的权限持久化到文件中去mSettings.writeRuntimePermissionsForUserLPr
RuntimePermission持久化
Settings.java
public void writeRuntimePermissionsForUserLPr(int userId, boolean sync) { if (sync) { mRuntimePermissionsPersistence.writePermissionsForUserSyncLPr(userId); } else { mRuntimePermissionsPersistence.writePermissionsForUserAsyncLPr(userId); } }
Settings.getPackageLPw这个方法,这是在安装应用扫描的时候scanPackageDirtyLI方法调用的,里面可以看到Settings类中的mUserIds、mPackages里面存的value还有PackageManagerService中的mPackages.pkg. mExtras都是同一个玩意奏是个PackageSetting。
private File getUserRuntimePermissionsFile(int userId) { // TODO: Implement a cleaner solution when adding tests. // This instead of Environment.getUserSystemDirectory(userId) to support testing. File userDir = new File(new File(mSystemDir, "users"), Integer.toString(userId)); return new File(userDir, RUNTIME_PERMISSIONS_FILE_NAME); }
在目录data/system/0/runtime-permissions.xml存放需要运行时申请的权限,Android6.0以上才有
<pkg name="com.snail.labaffinity"> <item name="android.permission.CALL_PHONE" granted="true" flags="0" /> <item name="android.permission.CAMERA" granted="false" flags="1" /> </pkg>
权限更新及持久化
RuntimePermission恢复(其实这里也包含普通权限)
这些持久化的数据会在手机启动的时候由PMS读取,开机启动,PKMS扫描Apk,并更新package信息,检查/data/system/packages.xml是否存在,这个文件是在解析apk时由writeLP()创建的,里面记录了系统的permissions,以及每个apk的name,codePath,flags,ts,version,uesrid等信息,这些信息主要通过apk的AndroidManifest.xml解析获取,解析完apk后将更新信息写入这个文件并保存到flash,下次开机直接从里面读取相关信息添加到内存相关列表中,当有apk升级,安装或删除时会更新这个文件,packages.xml放的只包括installpermission,runtimepermissiono由runtime-permissions.xml存放。
public PackageManagerService(Context context, Installer installer, boolean factoryTest, boolean onlyCore) { .... mSettings = new Settings(mPackages); //汇总并更新和Permission相关的信息 updatePermissionsLPw(null, null, true, regrantPermissions,regrantPermissions); //将信息写到package.xml、package.list及package-stopped.xml文件中 mSettings.writeLPr(); .... mFirstBoot = !mSettings.readLPw(sUserManager.getUsers(false)); Settings(File dataDir, Object lock) { mRuntimePermissionsPersistence = new RuntimePermissionPersistence(mLock); <!--加载package信息-->
根据SettingsFile或者BackupSettingsFile读取相应的设置信息 生成PackageSetting对象,里面有权限列表字段protected final PermissionsState mPermissionsState;,之后再运行中,动态权限的操作都是针对这个对象
boolean readLPw(@NonNull List<UserInfo> users) { FileInputStream str = null; if (mBackupSettingsFilename.exists()) { try { str = new FileInputStream(mBackupSettingsFilename); mReadMessages.append("Reading from backup settings file\n"); ... while ((type = parser.next()) != XmlPullParser.END_DOCUMENT && (type != XmlPullParser.END_TAG || parser.getDepth() > outerDepth)) { String tagName = parser.getName(); if (tagName.equals("package")) { !--读取package信息,包括install权限信息(对于Android6.0package.xml)--> readPackageLPw(parser); ... <!--读取runtime权限信息--> for (UserInfo user : users) { mRuntimePermissionsPersistence.readStateForUserSyncLPr(user.id); } } private void readPackageLPw(XmlPullParser parser) throws XmlPullParserException, IOException { String name = null; ... (tagName.equals(TAG_PERMISSIONS)) { readInstallPermissionsLPr(parser, packageSetting.getPermissionsState());
之后就可以checkpermission了
@Override public int checkUidPermission(String permName, int uid) { final int userId = UserHandle.getUserId(uid); if (!sUserManager.exists(userId)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_DENIED; } synchronized (mPackages) { Object obj = mSettings.getUserIdLPr(UserHandle.getAppId(uid)); if (obj != null) { final SettingBase ps = (SettingBase) obj; final PermissionsState permissionsState = ps.getPermissionsState(); if (permissionsState.hasPermission(permName, userId)) { return PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED; }
权限恢复流程
原来的权限存放位置在哪?不会都从Android Manifest清单去读取,只会在启动时读取一次。Android6.0之前会吧所有的权限都放置在data/system/packages.xml文件中。Android6.0之后,分为运行时权限跟普通权限,普通权限还是放在data/system/packages.xml中,运行时权限防止在data/system/users/0/runtime-permissions.xml文件中。根据运行时是否动态申请去更新权限。
Android6.0申请普通权限会怎么样
Android6.0里,普通权限仍然按照运行时权限的模型,只是granted="true",就是永远是取得授权的。所以可以直接获得权限申请成功的回调。如果查看packages.xml,就会发现:如下信息:
<perms> <item name="android.permission.INTERNET" granted="true" flags="0" /> <item name="android.permission.ACCESS_WIFI_STATE" granted="true" flags="0" /> </perms>
Android的关键节点,在哪里?
关键节点并不是查询是否具有该权限,Android6.0之前的 权限查询是不会触发权限申请与授权的,只有在请求系统服务的时候,由系统服务调用AppopsManager去查询是否赋予了该权限,第一次未操作肯定是null,未赋予就可能会触发权限申请逻辑,这个点在各个系统服务内部,由AppOpsService服务统一管理,不过对于官方的Release版本,其实只有系统通知APP才有动态权限管理的能力,其他都没有操作能力。