标签
PostgreSQL , 去重 , 单列去重 , 多列去重 , 行去重 , 多列混合去重 , varidict 参数 , 数组排序 , 数组元素重排
背景
去重的需求比较常见，去重也可以衍生出很多变种。例如
1. 单列去重，很好理解，就是按某列去除重复记录。保留规则（例如保留最新的，保留最旧的，或者保留某个其他字段最大的）。
2. 多列去重，按多列，去除重复记录。保留规则（例如保留最新的，保留最旧的，或者保留某个其他字段最大的）。
3. 行去重，按行，去除重复记录。保留规则（例如保留最新的，保留最旧的，或者保留某个其他字段最大的）。
4. 多列混合去重，按多列混合模式(ROW1: col1=1 , col2=2；ROW2: col1=2, col2=1；这种混合重复的去重)，去除重复记录。保留规则（例如保留最新的，保留最旧的，或者保留某个其他字段最大的）。
下面依次举例，使用不同的方法去重，用户可以自由选择效率最佳的。
单列去重
测试数据
create table test1(id int primary key, c1 int, c2 timestamp);
insert into test1 select generate_series(1,1000000), random()*1000, clock_timestamp();
create index idx_test1 on test1(c1,id);
-- 这个索引可以起到加速效果。如果没有这个索引，以下三种方法，第二种效率最高，其次是第三种。
需求：去除c1重复的行，保留id最大的。
方法1，使用聚合，not in
postgres=# explain delete from test1 where id not in (select max(id) from test1 group by c1);
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delete on test1 (cost=35115.63..53023.01 rows=500055 width=6)
-> Seq Scan on test1 (cost=35115.63..53023.01 rows=500055 width=6)
Filter: (NOT (hashed SubPlan 1))
SubPlan 1
-> GroupAggregate (cost=0.42..35113.13 rows=1001 width=8)
Group Key: test1_1.c1
-> Index Only Scan using idx_test1 on test1 test1_1 (cost=0.42..30102.57 rows=1000110 width=8)
(7 rows)
Time: 0.564 ms
postgres=# delete from test1 where id not in (select max(id) from test1 group by c1);
DELETE 998999
Time: 1126.504 ms (00:01.127)
方法2，使用窗口查询，IN
postgres=# explain select id from (select row_number() over(partition by c1 order by id) as rn, id from test1) t where t.rn<>1;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subquery Scan on t (cost=0.42..60075.54 rows=995109 width=4)
Filter: (t.rn <> 1)
-> WindowAgg (cost=0.42..47574.17 rows=1000110 width=16)
-> Index Only Scan using idx_test1 on test1 (cost=0.42..30072.24 rows=1000110 width=8)
(4 rows)
Time: 0.512 ms
postgres=# delete from test1 where id in (select id from (select row_number() over(partition by c1 order by id) as rn, id from test1) t where t.rn<>1);
DELETE 998999
Time: 2430.276 ms (00:02.430)
方法3，使用PLPGSQL，内部使用排序+游标。
每条记录判断一次的方法去重，只有一次排序+每条记录比对的开销。
do language plpgsql $$
declare
v_rec record;
v_c1 int;
cur1 cursor for select c1,id from test1 order by c1,id for update;
begin
for v_rec in cur1 loop
if v_rec.c1 = v_c1 then
delete from test1 where current of cur1;
end if;
v_c1 := v_rec.c1;
end loop;
end;
$$;
DO
Time: 7345.773 ms (00:07.346)
postgres=# select count(*) from test1;
count
-------
1001
(1 row)
Time: 61.672 ms
postgres=# select * from test1 limit 10;
id | c1 | c2
----+-----+----------------------------
1 | 582 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.60918
2 | 278 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.609331
3 | 659 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.609338
4 | 372 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.609341
5 | 184 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.609343
6 | 121 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.609345
7 | 132 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.609347
8 | 290 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.609348
9 | 980 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.60935
10 | 305 | 2017-06-02 10:21:10.609352
(10 rows)
PostgreSQL 10黑科技
即使只有部分驱动列，也能使用索引排序。
例如index(c1)，可以用于order by c1,id;
《PostgreSQL 10.0 preview 优化器改进 - 不完整索引支持复合排序》
多列去重
测试数据
create table test1(id int primary key, c1 int, c2 int, c3 timestamp);
insert into test1 select generate_series(1,1000000), random()*1000, random()*1000, clock_timestamp();
create index idx_test1 on test1(c1,c2,id);
-- 这个索引可以起到加速效果。
需求：去除c1,c2重复的行，保留id最大的。
方法1，
postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) delete from test1 where id not in (select max(id) from test1 group by c1,c2);
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delete on public.test1 (cost=40820.36..59690.36 rows=500000 width=6) (actual time=1634.960..1634.960 rows=0 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=1378788
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 (cost=40820.36..59690.36 rows=500000 width=6) (actual time=1090.956..1446.374 rows=367618 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid
Filter: (NOT (hashed SubPlan 1))
Rows Removed by Filter: 632382
Buffers: shared hit=1011170
SubPlan 1
-> GroupAggregate (cost=0.42..40570.36 rows=100000 width=12) (actual time=0.035..842.497 rows=632382 loops=1)
Output: max(test1_1.id), test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Group Key: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Buffers: shared hit=1004800
-> Index Only Scan using idx_test1 on public.test1 test1_1 (cost=0.42..32070.36 rows=1000000 width=12) (actual time=0.027..587.506 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2, test1_1.id
Heap Fetches: 1000000
Buffers: shared hit=1004800
Planning time: 0.211 ms
Execution time: 1641.679 ms
(18 rows)
方法2，
postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) delete from test1 where id in (select id from (select row_number() over(partition by c1,c2 order by id) as rn, id from test1) t where t.rn<>1);
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delete on public.test1 (cost=83752.89..130385.27 rows=995000 width=34) (actual time=2199.376..2199.376 rows=0 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=1378741, temp read=6482 written=6420
-> Hash Semi Join (cost=83752.89..130385.27 rows=995000 width=34) (actual time=1381.636..1929.284 rows=367584 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid, t.*
Hash Cond: (test1.id = t.id)
Buffers: shared hit=1011157, temp read=6482 written=6420
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 (cost=0.00..16370.00 rows=1000000 width=10) (actual time=0.013..140.130 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid, test1.id
Buffers: shared hit=6370
-> Hash (cost=64513.39..64513.39 rows=995000 width=32) (actual time=1377.349..1377.349 rows=367584 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.id
Buckets: 65536 Batches: 32 Memory Usage: 1326kB
Buffers: shared hit=1004787, temp written=2591
-> Subquery Scan on t (cost=0.42..64513.39 rows=995000 width=32) (actual time=0.074..1269.919 rows=367584 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.id
Filter: (t.rn <> 1)
Rows Removed by Filter: 632416
Buffers: shared hit=1004787
-> WindowAgg (cost=0.42..52013.39 rows=1000000 width=20) (actual time=0.054..1117.668 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: row_number() OVER (?), test1_1.id, test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Buffers: shared hit=1004787
-> Index Only Scan using idx_test1 on public.test1 test1_1 (cost=0.42..32013.39 rows=1000000 width=12) (actual time=0.035..627.329 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2, test1_1.id
Heap Fetches: 1000000
Buffers: shared hit=1004787
Planning time: 0.565 ms
Execution time: 2199.450 ms
(27 rows)
方法3，
postgres=# do language plpgsql $$
declare
v_rec record;
v_c1 int;
v_c2 int;
cur1 cursor for select c1,c2 from test1 order by c1,c2,id for update;
begin
for v_rec in cur1 loop
if v_rec.c1 = v_c1 and v_rec.c2=v_c2 then
delete from test1 where current of cur1;
end if;
v_c1 := v_rec.c1;
v_c2 := v_rec.c2;
end loop;
end;
$$;
DO
Time: 4637.183 ms (00:04.637)
行去重
测试数据
create table test1(c1 int, c2 int);
insert into test1 select random()*1000, random()*1000 from generate_series(1,1000000);
-- 行号ctid 系统列无法创建索引
需求：去除重复的行，保留任意一条。
因为没有PK了，可以通过行号来进行保留。
方法1，ctid的not in会导致loop，验证影响性能，不建议使用not in的方法
postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) delete from test1 where ctid not in (select max(ctid) from test1 group by c1,c2);
^CCancel request sent
ERROR: 57014: canceling statement due to user request
LOCATION: ProcessInterrupts, postgres.c:2984
Time: 426433.450 ms (07:06.433)
postgres=# truncate test1;
TRUNCATE TABLE
postgres=# insert into test1 select random()*1000, random()*1000 from generate_series(1,10000);
INSERT 0 10000
postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) select * from test1 where ctid not in (select max(ctid) from test1 group by c1,c2);
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on public.test1 (cost=222.97..90895.39 rows=5085 width=8) (actual time=54.451..7741.146 rows=51 loops=1)
Output: test1.c1, test1.c2
Filter: (NOT (SubPlan 1))
Rows Removed by Filter: 9949
Buffers: shared hit=90
SubPlan 1
发生了LOOP
-> Materialize (cost=222.97..238.23 rows=1017 width=14) (actual time=0.001..0.297 rows=5000 loops=10000)
Output: (max(test1_1.ctid)), test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Buffers: shared hit=45
-> HashAggregate (cost=222.97..233.14 rows=1017 width=14) (actual time=4.757..6.655 rows=9949 loops=1)
Output: max(test1_1.ctid), test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Group Key: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Buffers: shared hit=45
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 test1_1 (cost=0.00..146.70 rows=10170 width=14) (actual time=0.005..1.588 rows=10000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2, test1_1.ctid
Buffers: shared hit=45
Planning time: 0.121 ms
Execution time: 7741.277 ms
(18 rows)
使用用户定义的列不会有这个问题,已反馈给社区
drop table test1;
create table test1(id int, c1 int, c2 int);
insert into test1 select id, random()*1000, random()*1000 from generate_series(1,10000) t(id);
postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) select * from test1 where id not in (select max(id) from test1 group by c1,c2);
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on public.test1 (cost=1048.18..1243.43 rows=5610 width=12) (actual time=11.762..13.627 rows=48 loops=1)
Output: test1.id, test1.c1, test1.c2
Filter: (NOT (hashed SubPlan 1))
Rows Removed by Filter: 9952
Buffers: shared hit=110
SubPlan 1
-> GroupAggregate (cost=921.96..1045.38 rows=1122 width=12) (actual time=5.355..9.162 rows=9952 loops=1)
Output: max(test1_1.id), test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Group Key: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Buffers: shared hit=55
-> Sort (cost=921.96..950.01 rows=11220 width=12) (actual time=5.350..6.101 rows=10000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2, test1_1.id
Sort Key: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 853kB
Buffers: shared hit=55
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 test1_1 (cost=0.00..167.20 rows=11220 width=12) (actual time=0.004..1.528 rows=10000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2, test1_1.id
Buffers: shared hit=55
Planning time: 58.784 ms
Execution time: 13.685 ms
(20 rows)
方法2，
postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) delete from test1 where ctid in (select ctid from (select row_number() over(partition by c1,c2 order by ctid) as rn, ctid from test1) t where t.rn<>1);
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delete on public.test1 (cost=422032.41..427035.41 rows=500000 width=36) (actual time=3525.690..3525.690 rows=0 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=376073 dirtied=4398, temp read=10658 written=10683
-> Merge Join (cost=422032.41..427035.41 rows=500000 width=36) (actual time=3003.047..3352.172 rows=367223 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid, t.*
Inner Unique: true
Merge Cond: (test1.ctid = t.ctid)
Buffers: shared hit=8850, temp read=10658 written=10683
-> Sort (cost=122873.59..125373.59 rows=1000000 width=6) (actual time=786.814..883.721 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid
Sort Key: test1.ctid
Sort Method: external sort Disk: 15656kB
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=1957 written=1957
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=6) (actual time=0.021..112.431 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid
Buffers: shared hit=4425
-> Sort (cost=299158.81..299159.31 rows=200 width=36) (actual time=2216.021..2268.235 rows=367223 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.ctid
Sort Key: t.ctid
Sort Method: external sort Disk: 18688kB
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=8701 written=8726
-> Unique (cost=294176.17..299151.17 rows=200 width=36) (actual time=1790.180..1949.522 rows=367223 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.ctid
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=6365 written=6390
-> Sort (cost=294176.17..296663.67 rows=995000 width=36) (actual time=1790.179..1874.394 rows=367223 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.ctid
Sort Key: t.ctid
Sort Method: external merge Disk: 18744kB
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=6365 written=6390
-> Subquery Scan on t (cost=125069.59..160069.59 rows=995000 width=36) (actual time=692.878..1542.122 rows=367223 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.ctid
Filter: (t.rn <> 1)
Rows Removed by Filter: 632777
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=4022 written=4039
-> WindowAgg (cost=125069.59..147569.59 rows=1000000 width=22) (actual time=692.858..1401.210 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: row_number() OVER (?), test1_1.ctid, test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=4022 written=4039
-> Sort (cost=125069.59..127569.59 rows=1000000 width=14) (actual time=692.850..947.055 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.ctid, test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Sort Key: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2, test1_1.ctid
Sort Method: external merge Disk: 25496kB
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=4022 written=4039
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 test1_1 (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=14) (actual time=0.010..131.128 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.ctid, test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2
Buffers: shared hit=4425
Planning time: 0.247 ms
Execution time: 3547.727 ms
(46 rows)
方法3，
postgres=# do language plpgsql $$
declare
v_rec record;
v_c1 int;
v_c2 int;
cur1 cursor for select c1,c2 from test1 order by c1,c2,ctid for update;
begin
for v_rec in cur1 loop
if v_rec.c1 = v_c1 and v_rec.c2=v_c2 then
delete from test1 where current of cur1;
end if;
v_c1 := v_rec.c1;
v_c2 := v_rec.c2;
end loop;
end;
$$;
DO
Time: 5395.774 ms (00:05.396)
多列混合去重
多列去重，可以使用数组的方法，如下
但是需要注意数组内元素的顺序不一致时，两个数组元素是不相等的。
postgres=# select array[1,2] = array[2,1];
?column?
----------
f
(1 row)
postgres=# select array[1,2] @> array[2,1] and array[2,1] @> array[1,1,2];
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)
postgres=# select array[1,2] @> array[2,2,1] and array[2,1] @> array[1,1,2];
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)
所以需要对元素排序存放，将需要参与去重的列，作为数组元素即可。
创建一个支持任意列的排序函数，输出排序后的数组
postgres=# create or replace function sort_vals(variadic v_arr text[]) returns text[] as $$
select array_agg(arr order by arr) from unnest(v_arr) t(arr);
$$ language sql strict;
postgres=# select sort_vals('a','a','b','a','c');
sort_vals
-------------
{a,a,a,b,c}
(1 row)
测试数据
create table test1(c1 int, c2 int);
insert into test1 select random()*1000, random()*1000 from generate_series(1,1000000);
需求：去除c1,c2交叉重复的记录(1,2; 2,1 认为是重复的)，保留任意一条。
方法2-1，使用sort_vals排序重组数组（简单，好理解）
postgres=# explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers) delete from test1 where ctid in (select ctid from (select row_number() over(partition by sort_vals(c1::text,c2::text) order by ctid) as rn, ctid from test1) t where t.rn<>1);
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delete on public.test1 (cost=963704.16..968707.16 rows=500000 width=36) (actual time=16466.913..16466.913 rows=0 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=576071, temp read=18863 written=18901
-> Merge Join (cost=963704.16..968707.16 rows=500000 width=36) (actual time=15766.506..16202.766 rows=567213 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid, t.*
Inner Unique: true
Merge Cond: (test1.ctid = t.ctid)
Buffers: shared hit=8858, temp read=18863 written=18901
-> Sort (cost=122873.59..125373.59 rows=1000000 width=6) (actual time=782.867..880.729 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid
Sort Key: test1.ctid
Sort Method: external sort Disk: 15656kB
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=1957 written=1957
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 (cost=0.00..14425.00 rows=1000000 width=6) (actual time=0.009..110.757 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid
Buffers: shared hit=4425
-> Sort (cost=840830.56..840831.06 rows=200 width=36) (actual time=14983.595..15066.186 rows=567213 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.ctid
Sort Key: t.ctid
Sort Method: external sort Disk: 28864kB
Buffers: shared hit=4433, temp read=16906 written=16944
-> Unique (cost=835847.92..840822.92 rows=200 width=36) (actual time=14316.637..14568.357 rows=567213 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.ctid
Buffers: shared hit=4433, temp read=13298 written=13336
-> Sort (cost=835847.92..838335.42 rows=995000 width=36) (actual time=14316.636..14456.355 rows=567213 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.ctid
Sort Key: t.ctid
Sort Method: external merge Disk: 28952kB
Buffers: shared hit=4433, temp read=13298 written=13336
-> Subquery Scan on t (cost=409241.34..701741.34 rows=995000 width=36) (actual time=12177.370..13945.667 rows=567213 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.ctid
Filter: (t.rn <> 1)
Rows Removed by Filter: 432787
Buffers: shared hit=4433, temp read=9679 written=9704
-> WindowAgg (cost=409241.34..689241.34 rows=1000000 width=46) (actual time=12177.303..13765.873 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: row_number() OVER (?), test1_1.ctid, (sort_vals(VARIADIC ARRAY[(test1_1.c1)::text, (test1_1.c2)::text]))
Buffers: shared hit=4433, temp read=9679 written=9704
-> Sort (cost=409241.34..411741.34 rows=1000000 width=38) (actual time=12177.293..13163.065 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.ctid, (sort_vals(VARIADIC ARRAY[(test1_1.c1)::text, (test1_1.c2)::text]))
Sort Key: (sort_vals(VARIADIC ARRAY[(test1_1.c1)::text, (test1_1.c2)::text])), test1_1.ctid
Sort Method: external merge Disk: 51904kB
Buffers: shared hit=4430, temp read=9679 written=9704
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 test1_1 (cost=0.00..274425.00 rows=1000000 width=38) (actual time=0.202..8735.620 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.ctid, sort_vals(VARIADIC ARRAY[(test1_1.c1)::text, (test1_1.c2)::text])
Buffers: shared hit=4425
Planning time: 0.292 ms
Execution time: 16500.934 ms
(46 rows)
方法2-2，使用SUBQUERY排序重组数组，（效率高，烧脑）
explain (analyze,verbose,timing,costs,buffers)
delete from test1 where ctid in
(
select rid from
(
select row_number() over(partition by val order by rid) as rn, rid from
(
select rid, array_agg(arr order by arr) val from
(select ctid rid, unnest(array[c1,c2]) arr from test1) t
group by rid
) t
) t
where t.rn<>1
);
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delete on public.test1 (cost=18979422.39..18984425.62 rows=199 width=36) (actual time=10186.459..10186.459 rows=0 loops=1)
Buffers: shared hit=575991, temp read=19174 written=19212
-> Merge Semi Join (cost=18979422.39..18984425.62 rows=199 width=36) (actual time=9421.861..9923.844 rows=567141 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid, t.*
Merge Cond: (test1.ctid = t.rid)
Buffers: shared hit=8850, temp read=19174 written=19212
-> Sort (cost=122879.44..125379.56 rows=1000050 width=6) (actual time=796.023..894.723 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid
Sort Key: test1.ctid
Sort Method: external sort Disk: 15656kB
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=1957 written=1957
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 (cost=0.00..14425.50 rows=1000050 width=6) (actual time=0.016..122.654 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1.ctid
Buffers: shared hit=4425
-> Sort (cost=18856542.95..18856543.45 rows=199 width=36) (actual time=8625.739..8775.583 rows=567141 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.rid
Sort Key: t.rid
Sort Method: external merge Disk: 28952kB
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=17217 written=17255
-> Subquery Scan on t (cost=18856528.85..18856535.35 rows=199 width=36) (actual time=6749.159..8251.185 rows=567141 loops=1)
Output: t.*, t.rid
Filter: (t.rn <> 1)
Rows Removed by Filter: 432859
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=13598 written=13623
-> WindowAgg (cost=18856528.85..18856532.85 rows=200 width=46) (actual time=6749.138..8073.103 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: row_number() OVER (?), test1_1.ctid, (array_agg((unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2])) ORDER BY (unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2]))))
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=13598 written=13623
-> Sort (cost=18856528.85..18856529.35 rows=200 width=38) (actual time=6749.128..7507.854 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.ctid, (array_agg((unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2])) ORDER BY (unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2]))))
Sort Key: (array_agg((unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2])) ORDER BY (unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2])))), test1_1.ctid
Sort Method: external merge Disk: 44040kB
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=13598 written=13623
-> GroupAggregate (cost=18106479.21..18856519.21 rows=200 width=38) (actual time=2315.955..4053.484 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.ctid, array_agg((unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2])) ORDER BY (unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2])))
Group Key: test1_1.ctid
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=5382 written=5382
-> Sort (cost=18106479.21..18356491.71 rows=100005000 width=10) (actual time=2315.934..2530.362 rows=2000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.ctid, (unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2]))
Sort Key: test1_1.ctid
Sort Method: external sort Disk: 43056kB
Buffers: shared hit=4425, temp read=5382 written=5382
-> ProjectSet (cost=0.00..521950.88 rows=100005000 width=10) (actual time=0.019..836.774 rows=2000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.ctid, unnest(ARRAY[test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2])
Buffers: shared hit=4425
-> Seq Scan on public.test1 test1_1 (cost=0.00..14425.50 rows=1000050 width=14) (actual time=0.010..137.319 rows=1000000 loops=1)
Output: test1_1.c1, test1_1.c2, test1_1.ctid
Buffers: shared hit=4425
Planning time: 0.241 ms
Execution time: 10228.121 ms
(49 rows)
方法3，
postgres=# do language plpgsql $$
declare
v_rec record;
v_arr text[];
cur1 cursor for select sort_vals(c1::text,c2::text) as arr from test1 order by sort_vals(c1::text,c2::text),ctid for update;
begin
for v_rec in cur1 loop
if v_rec.arr = v_arr then
delete from test1 where current of cur1;
end if;
v_arr := v_rec.arr;
end loop;
end;
$$;
DO
Time: 18542.457 ms (00:18.542)
小结
有索引加速和没有索引加速时，三种方法在性能相差比较大。
但是最稳定的还是窗口函数的方法，所以建议使用窗口函数的方法，最靠谱。
数组内元素顺序不一致时，并不相等，可以自定义重排函数。
