需求：
-
把每天的慢查询日志进行按库切割
-
对每个库的慢查询日志进行分析
思路：
| 工具/功能 | 一般统计信息 | 高级统计信息 | 脚本 | 优势 |
| mysqldumpslow | 支持 | 不支持 | perl | mysql官方自带 |
| mysqlsla | 支持 | 支持 | perl | 功能强大,数据报表齐全,定制化能力强. |
| mysql-explain-slow-log | 支持 | 不支持 | perl | 无 |
| mysql-log-filter | 支持 | 部分支持 | python or php | 不失功能的前提下,保持输出简洁 |
| myprofi | 支持 | 不支持 | php | 非常精简 |
通过google出来的这几款工具，mysqlsla的帮助文档提示是可以根据-db来进行分库筛选的，但是却无法得出想要的结果，不知道是不是我打开姿势不对的原因还是怎么着~ 后来一想就撸一把吧，虽然很糙~
约束条件：
切割工具：python脚本
慢查询日志分析工具：mysqlsla
日志格式：
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
# Time: 150331 22:23:48
# User@Host: test[test] @ [192.168.1.200]
# Thread_id: 251049087 Schema: zhuima Last_errno: 0 Killed: 0
# Query_time: 4.581437 Lock_time: 0.000072 Rows_sent: 0 Rows_examined: 741 Rows_affected: 0 Rows_read: 740
# Bytes_sent: 89 Tmp_tables: 0 Tmp_disk_tables: 0 Tmp_table_sizes: 0
use zhuima;
SET timestamp=1427811828;
SELECT cid FROM user_point_list where uid =
'473781'
and (cid =
'ni'
or cid =
'ac'
or cid =
'qq'
or cid =
'de'
or cid =
'ec'
) limit 0,10;
|
python脚本：
用法：python script_name slow.log_name
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
|
[root@mysql01 test]# cat cut_slog.py
#!/usr/bin/evn python
#coding:utf8
#Author:zhuima
#QQ:993182876
'''
实现功能，对每日的慢查询日志进行按库名称切割
注意事项:
1、由于是把慢查询日志直接读进内存的，所以slow.log如果过大，会产生假死情况.
'''
import time
import re
import sys
def get_file_content(fname):
'''
获取文件内容，这里是把所有文件直接读进内存的
'''
fp = file(fname)
content = fp.read()
fp.close()
return content
def get_dbname():
'''
1、获取所有包含Schema的字符串
2、再次进行筛选，获取最终的db名称
3、对list进行排序去重
4、最终获得当前日志中所有数据库的名称
'''
db_key = re.findall(r'Schema: \w+',content)
dbname_list = []
for db in db_key:
match_db_key = re.search(r'\s{1}\w+',db)
if match_db_key:
dbname_list.append(match_db_key.group().strip())
dbnamelist = list(set(dbname_list))
return dbnamelist
def cut_slog_bydbname():
'''
根据获取的db名称来进行分库重写操作
'''
dblist = get_dbname()
content_list = content.split(';\n#')
for i in range(len(dblist)):
db_name = dblist[i]
dblist[i] = [ x for x in content_list if dblist[i] in x]
for n in range(len(dblist[i])):
if n == 0:
dblist[i][n] = '#' + dblist[i][n]+';'
elif n == len(dblist):
dblist[i][n] = '#' + dblist[i][n]
else:
dblist[i][n] = '#' + dblist[i][n] + ';'
new_fp = file(db_name,'w')
new_fp.write('\n'.join(dblist[i]))
new_fp.close()
def main():
'''
统计脚本执行所消耗的时间
'''
start_time = time.time()
cut_slog_bydbname()
end_time = time.time()
take_time = end_time - start_time
print 'Running This Script Take %s Time' % take_time
if __name__ == '__main__':
fname = sys.argv[1]
content = get_file_content(fname)
main()
|
对170M大小的文件进行切割过程及耗费时长:
使用mysqlsla分析查看：
致胜王牌：
其实说了那么多，实际上新贵pt-query-digest是可以胜任这个任务的部分工作的，比如按照库进行分析。
光说不练假把式，来点干货上来，先安装好工具再说
|
1
|
yum install http://www.percona.com/downloads/percona-release/redhat/0.1-3/percona-release-0.1-3.noarch.rpm
|
用起来：
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
[root@mysql01 test]# pt-query-digest --filter '$event->{db} =~ m/app_zhuima/ and $event->{arg} =~ m/^select/i' --order-by max --limit=10 s.log
s.log: 36% 00:52 remain
s.log: 75% 00:19 remain
--order-by attribute max doesn't exist, using Query_time:sum
# 78s user time, 540ms system time, 41.20M rss, 223.39M vsz
# Current date: Fri Apr 3 12:11:02 2015
# Hostname: mysql01.opsdev.cn
# Files: s.log
# Overall: 101.75k total, 99 unique, 0.16 QPS, 0.02x concurrency _________
# Time range: 2015-03-16 09:10:59 to 2015-03-23 18:03:22
# Attribute total min max avg 95% stddev median
# ============ ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
# Exec time 12085s 230us 5s 119ms 253ms 123ms 53ms
# Lock time 26s 52us 2s 255us 224us 11ms 119us
# Rows sent 477.36k 0 2.92k 4.80 17.65 71.55 0
# Rows examine 1.77G 0 36.01k 18.23k 33.17k 12.57k 19.40k
# Rows affecte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# Rows read 122.33M 0 18.75k 1.23k 7.31k 2.85k 1.96
# Bytes sent 404.76M 60 70.40k 4.07k 28.66k 8.92k 246.02
# Tmp tables 22.58k 0 1 0.23 0.99 0.42 0
# Tmp disk tbl 1.12k 0 1 0.01 0 0.10 0
# Tmp tbl size 25.78G 0 25.25M 265.70k 0 2.11M 0
# Query size 19.09M 46 20.21k 196.76 271.23 233.92 174.84
# Profile
# Rank Query ID Response time Calls R/Call V/M Item
# ==== ================== =============== ===== ====== ===== =============
# 1 0xDF65C6303461AC09 551.9743 4.6% 10798 0.0511 0.01 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 2 0xB12492DDCD79AC3C 8.1966 0.1% 10612 0.0008 0.01 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 3 0x132FC5C1DD41AB40 8.5364 0.1% 10612 0.0008 0.10 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 4 0xE5745B6DB0863C99 2156.1381 17.8% 8986 0.2399 0.02 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 5 0xF4F4AC9E9B2C9707 1186.5799 9.8% 6982 0.1699 0.04 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 6 0xFA2AFA52C427310A 1572.7090 13.0% 6554 0.2400 0.01 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 7 0x46E8908EFD5250D1 1017.2819 8.4% 5370 0.1894 0.03 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 8 0x1B0924852232D745 196.3949 1.6% 4129 0.0476 0.01 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 9 0xF7A7B1118F17CC05 716.8696 5.9% 3014 0.2378 0.01 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 10 0xC4422E67F9F74B81 140.8687 1.2% 2958 0.0476 0.00 SELECT apk_index apk_content?
# 80 0xF1F228E747F8E739 62.4422 0.5% 19 3.2864 0.31 SELECT apk_tid
# MISC 0xMISC 4466.9640 37.0% 31721 0.1408 0.0 <
88
ITEMS>
# Query 1: 0.02 QPS, 0.00x concurrency, ID 0xDF65C6303461AC09 at byte 4659
# This item is included in the report because it matches --limit.
# Scores: V/M = 0.01
# Time range: 2015-03-16 09:11:01 to 2015-03-23 17:57:15
# Attribute pct total min max avg 95% stddev median
# ============ === ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
# Count 10 10798
# Exec time 4 552s 2ms 935ms 51ms 65ms 20ms 51ms
# Lock time 5 1s 75us 5ms 137us 194us 110us 113us
# Rows sent 2 11.72k 0 18 1.11 17.65 4.25 0
# Rows examine 11 202.50M 36 20.49k 19.20k 20.37k 4.85k 20.37k
# Rows affecte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# Rows read 0 17.73k 0 7.62k 1.68 0.99 72.02 0.99
# Bytes sent 9 37.17M 1.64k 54.05k 3.53k 30.09k 7.17k 1.61k
# Tmp tables 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# Tmp disk tbl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# Tmp tbl size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# Query size 9 1.82M 172 178 176.50 174.84 2.02 174.84
# String:
# Databases app_zhuima
# Hosts
# Last errno 0
# Users app_zhuima
# Query_time distribution
# 1us
# 10us
# 100us
# 1ms ###
# 10ms ################################################################
# 100ms #
# 1s
# 10s+
# Tables
# SHOW TABLE STATUS FROM `app_zhuima` LIKE 'apk_xindex'\G
# SHOW CREATE TABLE `app_zhuima`.`apk_xindex`\G
# SHOW TABLE STATUS FROM `app_zhuima` LIKE 'apk_xx'\G
# SHOW CREATE TABLE `app_zhuima`.`apk_xx`\G
# EXPLAIN /*!50100 PARTITIONS*/
select a.title,a.postdate,a.url,b.* from apk_index a,apk_xx b where a.tid=b.tid and a.ifpub=1 and a.publisher != 'adminzhuima' order by postdate desc limit 1294510,18\G
|
本文转自lovelace521 51CTO博客，原文链接：http://blog.51cto.com/lovelace/1627961，如需转载请自行联系原作者
