biti_rainy
关于cursor_sharing=similar
我们先看看在表没有分析无统计数据情况下的表现
SQL>[color=red] alter session set cursor_sharing = similar; [/color]
Session altered.
SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name like '%parse%';
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
parse time cpu 4948
parse time elapsed 4468
parse count (total) 170148
[color=red]parse count (hard) 1619 (硬分析次数)[/color]
parse count (failures) 80
SQL>[color=red] select count(*) from t where object_id = 1000; [/color]
COUNT(*)
----------
0
SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name like '%parse%';
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
parse time cpu 4948
parse time elapsed 4468
parse count (total) 170172
parse count (hard) 1620
parse count (failures) 80
SQL> /
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
parse time cpu 4948
parse time elapsed 4468
parse count (total) 170176
[color=red]parse count (hard) 1620 [/color]
parse count (failures) 80
SQL> [color=red]select count(*) from t where object_id = 1000; [/color]
COUNT(*)
----------
0
SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name like '%parse%';
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
parse time cpu 4948
parse time elapsed 4468
parse count (total) 170178
[color=red]parse count (hard) 1620 [/color]
parse count (failures) 80
SQL> [color=red]select count(*) from t where object_id = 1001; [/color]
COUNT(*)
----------
0
SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name like '%parse%';
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
parse time cpu 4948
parse time elapsed 4468
parse count (total) 170180
[color=red]parse count (hard) 1620(即使object_id发生变化依然没有硬解析)[/color]
parse count (failures) 80
我们再来看分析表和字段信息后的表现
SQL>[color=red] analyze table t1 compute statistics for table for columns object_id; [/color]
Table analyzed.
SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name like '%parse%';
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
parse time cpu 4973
parse time elapsed 4495
parse count (total) 170982
[color=red]parse count (hard) 1640 [/color]
parse count (failures) 80
SQL>[color=red] select count(*) from t1 where object_id = 5000; [/color]
COUNT(*)
----------
0
SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name like '%parse%';
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
parse time cpu 4973
parse time elapsed 4495
parse count (total) 170984
[color=red]parse count (hard) 1641 [/color]
parse count (failures) 80
SQL>[color=red] select count(*) from t1 where object_id = 5000; [/color]
COUNT(*)
----------
0
SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name like '%parse%';
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
parse time cpu 4973
parse time elapsed 4495
parse count (total) 171008
[color=red]parse count (hard) 1641 (重复执行没发生变化)[/color]
parse count (failures) 80
SQL>[color=red] select count(*) from t1 where object_id = 5001; [/color]
COUNT(*)
----------
0
SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name like '%parse%';
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
parse time cpu 4973
parse time elapsed 4495
parse count (total) 171010
[color=red]parse count (hard) 1642 (当object_id变化的时候产生硬分析)[/color]
parse count (failures) 80
SQL>
SQL> select sql_text,child_number from v$sql where sql_text like 'select count(*) from t1 where%';
SQL_TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHILD_NUMBER
------------
select count(*) from t1 where object_id = :"SYS_B_0"
0
select count(*) from t1 where object_id = :"SYS_B_0"
1
可以看出若存在object_id的 histograms ,则每次是不同的 值 的时候都产生硬解析 ,若不存在 histograms ,则不产生硬解析 。换句话说,当表的字段被分析过存在histograms的时候,similar 的表现和exact一样,当表的字段没被分析不存在histograms的时候,similar的表现和force一样。这样避免了一味地如force一样转换成变量形式,因为有hostograms的情况下转换成变量之后就容易产生错误的执行计划,没有利用上统计信息。而exact呢,在没有hostograms的情况下也要分别产生硬解析,这样的话,由于执行计划不会受到数据分布的影响(因为没有统计信息)重新解析是没有实质意义的。而similar则综合了两者的优点。
原文参考
[url]http://blog.csdn.net/biti_rainy/archive/2004/07/12/learn_oracle_20040712_3.aspx[/url]
更多内容参考
[url]http://blog.csdn.net/biti_rainy[/url]