并发管理器的工作原理 和 cmclean.sql的潜在危险

简介: DBAs usually use the script to clean up stale data from concurrent processing tables (FND_CONCURRENT_%) after incidents like a crash of the database or concurrent processing node.

DBAs usually use the script to clean up stale data from concurrent processing tables (FND_CONCURRENT_%) after incidents like a crash of the database or concurrent processing node. This script sets correct completion phase and status codes for terminated concurrent requests and sets correct control codes for terminated concurrent manager processes. Despite the assuring “Non Destructive” claim in the title of the MOS Article there is a possibility to lose concurrent request schedules when cmclean.sql is executed.

First of all it’s important to understand how scheduled concurrent requests are executed and resubmitted. A simplified process of the execution is:

  1. Concurrent manager process (e.g. FNDLIBR in case of Standard Manager) queries the FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS table for pending requests.
  2. When a pending request is found, the manager process updates the PHASE_CODE=R (Running) and STATUS_CODE=R (Running).
  3. The next step is to start the executable of the concurrent program. If it’s a PL/SQL procedure – FNDLIBR  connects to the DB and executes the PL/SQL code, if it’s a java program – FNDLIBR starts up a java process to execute the java class, etc.
  4. FNDLIBR catches the exit codes from the executable of the concurrent program and updates the statuses in FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS accordingly – PHASE_CODE=C (Completed) and STATUS_CODE = C (Normal), G (Warning) or E (Error).
  5. FNDLIBR checks if the concurrent request has a schedule and needs to be resubmitted. If yes – it resubmits a new concurrent request with the same parameters.

But what happens if the FNDLIBR process crashes, terminates or gets killed while it’s running a concurrent request? Who takes care of the statuses in FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS table and how the request is resubmitted if the concurrent manager process is not there anymore?

It appears the Internal Concurrent Manager (ICM) takes care of these tasks. It checks the running requests periodically (every two minutes by default) and if it finds any that are missing the concurrent manager process and the DB session, it updates the statuses for the concurrent request and also resubmits it if it has a schedule. This action is followed by a log entry in the ICM log file:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
                    Process monitor session started : 17-JUL-2013 04:24:24
 
Found running request 5829148 attached to dead manager process.
Setting request status to completed.
 
Found dead process: spid=(15160), cpid=(2032540), ORA pid=(35), manager=(0/0)
 
Starting STANDARD Concurrent Manager               : 17-JUL-2013 04:24:25
 
                      Process monitor session ended : 17-JUL-2013 04:24:25

Interesting to note, if the Internal Concurrent Manager is terminated at the same time with the manager process and is restarted later by the reviver process or by running “adcmctl.sh start” manually, the ICM performs the same check of running requests as part of the startup sequence, but this time it restarts the request instead of terminating and resubmitting it. The log of the ICM contains the following lines:

1
2
Found running request 5829146 attached to dead manager process.
Attempting to restart request.

The concurrent request is started again with exactly the same request_id as the previous time it was terminated, and the log file of the request will contain information from 2 executions – the 1st which didn’t complete and then the 2nd which probably completed. I think this scenario is very confusing and instead of restarting the request it should better be terminated and a new one should be submitted.

Let’s get back to the problem with cmclean.sql! The worst thing that can be done is running cmclean.sqlafter the crash of the concurrent processing node before starting up the concurrent managers. Why? Because cmclean.sql cleans up data in FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS by executing one simple update statement to change the phase and status of any “Running” or “Terminating” request to “Completed/Error”:

1
2
3
UPDATE fnd_concurrent_requests
SET phase_code = 'C' , status_code = 'E'
WHERE status_code = 'T' OR phase_code = 'R' ;

Cmclean.sql does not resubmit the request if it has a schedule. Execute it and you risk to lose some scheduled programs without any warning.

Similarly – never run cmclean.sql if you stopped the concurrent managers using “adcmctl.sh abort” or “kill -9” on concurrent manager processes to speed up the shutdown procedure. There’s the same risk to lose some scheduled requests.

Despite the risks, cmclean.sql is still a useful tool in case concurrent managers don’t come up after a failure or there are some stale data that is otherwise not cleaned up. But please, be careful when you run it! Check closely the list of requests reported in the following section of the outputs from cmclean.sql, because these requests have to be resubmitted manually if they had schedules.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-- Updating any Running or Terminating requests to Completed/Error
 
Request ID Phase  Status
---------- ------ ------
6607       R      W
6700       R      W
893534056  R      R
 
3 rows updated.

“Concurrent Manager Recovery” wizard is even worse! (Added on Jul 21, 2013)

After posting this article I started thinking about whether the “Concurrent Manager Recovery” Wizard available from Oracle Applications Manager in e-Business Suite was any better then cmclean.sql or not. As I didn’t have much experience with it I decided to give it a try. This is what I did:

  1. I scheduled 2 concurrent programs (“CP Java Regression Test” and “CP PLSQL Regression Test”) to restart in 1 minute after the previous execution completes. These are simple test concurrent programs which sleep for some time and then complete.
  2. I made sure both programs were running and terminated all concurrent manager process and DB sessions for these concurrent programs.
  3. The termination of the processes and sessions left the rows in FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS with PHASE_CODE=R and STATUS_CODE=R
  4. I executed the “Concurrent Manager Recovery” wizard which fixed the status codes of the concurrent manager processes, but didn’t touch the statuses of the concurrent requests – I thought this was a good thing (I expected the ICM to clean up the statuses and resubmit the requests at its startup phase)
  5. I started up the concurrent managers, but ICM didn’t clean up the 2 stale records in FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS table. The 2 requests appeared as they would be running, while in fact they didn’t have any OS processes or DB sessions.

I didn’t have much time to look into the details, but it looks like the ICM is only cleaning up requests attached to dead managers (“Active” status in the FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES table and no OS processes running). Here, the Wizard updated the statuses of the manager processes as if they completed normally, so the ICM couldn’t identify them as being “dead”.
This actually means that the “Concurrent Manager Recovery” wizard can cause serious issues too – it doesn’t clear up the concurrent_request statuses and it prevents ICM from doing it too, so once we start up the system the terminated requests appear as if they were running. And because of this, the Conflict Resolution Manager might prevent execution of some other programs with the incompatibility rules against the terminated requests. You will need to stop the managers and run cmclean.sql to fix the statuses (and loose the schedules) to get out of this situation.

So what should we do to clean up the concurrent processing tables after crashes or cloning? (Added on Jul 21, 2013)

It appears to me that no reliable way exists to clean up the tables properly. The cmclean.sql can remove some schedules without warning. The “Concurrent Manager Recovery” wizard may leave some requests in the running state even if they were terminated.
I’m going to open a SR for Oracle to request a proper solution, but meanwhile I’d suggest to use the cmclean.sql. However, make sure to check its outputs carefully and reschedule any requests which got cleaned up (as described above).


P.S. The description of the behavior of ICM in this blog post is a result of investigation performed on R12.1.3. I believe it behaves the same way in R12.1 and probably even in R12.0 and 11i, but I didn’t check. MOS Article ID 134007.1 which contains the cmclean.sql script is valid for Applications versions 10.7 to 12.1.3 – be careful when using it independently from the version of your e-Business Suite installation.







相关文章
|
2月前
|
存储 SQL 关系型数据库
mysql底层原理:索引、慢查询、 sql优化、事务、隔离级别、MVCC、redolog、undolog(图解+秒懂+史上最全)
mysql底层原理:索引、慢查询、 sql优化、事务、隔离级别、MVCC、redolog、undolog(图解+秒懂+史上最全)
mysql底层原理:索引、慢查询、 sql优化、事务、隔离级别、MVCC、redolog、undolog(图解+秒懂+史上最全)
|
5月前
|
SQL 安全 关系型数据库
SQL注入之万能密码:原理、实践与防御全解析
本文深入解析了“万能密码”攻击的运行机制及其危险性,通过实例展示了SQL注入的基本原理与变种形式。文章还提供了企业级防御方案,包括参数化查询、输入验证、权限控制及WAF规则配置等深度防御策略。同时,探讨了二阶注入和布尔盲注等新型攻击方式,并给出开发者自查清单。最后强调安全防护需持续改进,无绝对安全,建议使用成熟ORM框架并定期审计。技术内容仅供学习参考,严禁非法用途。
837 0
|
4月前
|
SQL 存储 自然语言处理
SQL的解析和优化的原理:一条sql 执行过程是什么?
SQL的解析和优化的原理:一条sql 执行过程是什么?
SQL的解析和优化的原理:一条sql 执行过程是什么?
|
5月前
|
SQL 人工智能 自然语言处理
Text2SQL圣经:从0到1精通Text2Sql(Chat2Sql)的原理,以及Text2Sql开源项目的使用
Text2SQL圣经:从0到1精通Text2Sql(Chat2Sql)的原理,以及Text2Sql开源项目的使用
Text2SQL圣经:从0到1精通Text2Sql(Chat2Sql)的原理,以及Text2Sql开源项目的使用
|
6月前
|
SQL 缓存 Java
框架源码私享笔记(02)Mybatis核心框架原理 | 一条SQL透析核心组件功能特性
本文详细解构了MyBatis的工作机制,包括解析配置、创建连接、执行SQL、结果封装和关闭连接等步骤。文章还介绍了MyBatis的五大核心功能特性:支持动态SQL、缓存机制(一级和二级缓存)、插件扩展、延迟加载和SQL注解,帮助读者深入了解其高效灵活的设计理念。
|
9月前
|
SQL 存储 关系型数据库
MySQL进阶突击系列(01)一条简单SQL搞懂MySQL架构原理 | 含实用命令参数集
本文从MySQL的架构原理出发,详细介绍其SQL查询的全过程,涵盖客户端发起SQL查询、服务端SQL接口、解析器、优化器、存储引擎及日志数据等内容。同时提供了MySQL常用的管理命令参数集,帮助读者深入了解MySQL的技术细节和优化方法。
|
11月前
|
SQL 关系型数据库 数据库
SQL数据库:核心原理与应用实践
随着信息技术的飞速发展,数据库管理系统已成为各类组织和企业中不可或缺的核心组件。在众多数据库管理系统中,SQL(结构化查询语言)数据库以其强大的数据管理能力和灵活性,广泛应用于各类业务场景。本文将深入探讨SQL数据库的基本原理、核心特性以及实际应用。一、SQL数据库概述SQL数据库是一种关系型数据库
372 5
|
11月前
|
SQL 监控 安全
SQL注入公鸡分类及原理
SQL注入公鸡分类及原理
|
11月前
|
SQL 关系型数据库 MySQL
sql注入原理与实战(三)数据库操作
sql注入原理与实战(三)数据库操作
sql注入原理与实战(三)数据库操作
|
11月前
|
SQL 分布式计算 大数据
大数据-97 Spark 集群 SparkSQL 原理详细解析 Broadcast Shuffle SQL解析过程(一)
大数据-97 Spark 集群 SparkSQL 原理详细解析 Broadcast Shuffle SQL解析过程(一)
250 0