先看看代码吧,模拟1000个并发,每个测试1000次操作,循环测试10轮。分别测试Put和Get操作import java.util.Collections;
Put time HashMapSync=3966ms.
Put time ConcurrentHashMap=1892ms.
Put time Hashtable=3892ms.
Get time HashMapSync=3812ms.
Get time ConcurrentHashMap=1828ms.
Get time Hashtable=3985ms.
结论
ConcurrentHashMap的性能比同步的HashMap快一倍左右,同步的HashMap和Hashtable的性能相当。
import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.Hashtable; import java.util.Map; import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap; /** * 测试HashMap和ConcurrentHashMap的并发性能差别。 * * @author 老紫竹 JAVA世纪网(java2000.net) * */ public class T { static final int threads = 1000; static final int NUMBER = 1000; public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { Map<String, Integer> hashmapSync = Collections .synchronizedMap(new HashMap<String, Integer>()); Map<String, Integer> concurrentHashMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<String, Integer>(); Map<String, Integer> hashtable = new Hashtable<String, Integer>(); long totalA = 0; long totalB = 0; long totalC = 0; for (int i = 0; i <= 10; i++) { totalA += testPut(hashmapSync); totalB += testPut(concurrentHashMap); totalC += testPut(hashtable); } System.out.println("Put time HashMapSync=" + totalA + "ms."); System.out.println("Put time ConcurrentHashMap=" + totalB + "ms."); System.out.println("Put time Hashtable=" + totalC + "ms."); totalA = 0; totalB = 0; totalC = 0; for (int i = 0; i <= 10; i++) { totalA += testGet(hashmapSync); totalB += testGet(concurrentHashMap); totalC += testGet(hashtable); } System.out.println("Get time HashMapSync=" + totalA + "ms."); System.out.println("Get time ConcurrentHashMap=" + totalB + "ms."); System.out.println("Get time Hashtable=" + totalC + "ms."); } public static long testPut(Map<String, Integer> map) throws Exception { long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < threads; i++) { new MapPutThread(map).start(); } while (MapPutThread.counter > 0) { Thread.sleep(1); } return System.currentTimeMillis() - start; } public static long testGet(Map<String, Integer> map) throws Exception { long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < threads; i++) { new MapPutThread(map).start(); } while (MapPutThread.counter > 0) { Thread.sleep(1); } return System.currentTimeMillis() - start; } } class MapPutThread extends Thread { static int counter = 0; static Object lock = new Object(); private Map<String, Integer> map; private String key = this.getId() + ""; MapPutThread(Map<String, Integer> map) { synchronized (lock) { counter++; } this.map = map; } public void run() { for (int i = 1; i <= T.NUMBER; i++) { map.put(key, i); } synchronized (lock) { counter--; } } } class MapGetThread extends Thread { static int counter = 0; static Object lock = new Object(); private Map<String, Integer> map; private String key = this.getId() + ""; MapGetThread(Map<String, Integer> map) { synchronized (lock) { counter++; } this.map = map; } public void run() { for (int i = 1; i <= T.NUMBER; i++) { map.get(key); } synchronized (lock) { counter--; } } }运行结果
Put time HashMapSync=3966ms.
Put time ConcurrentHashMap=1892ms.
Put time Hashtable=3892ms.
Get time HashMapSync=3812ms.
Get time ConcurrentHashMap=1828ms.
Get time Hashtable=3985ms.
结论
ConcurrentHashMap的性能比同步的HashMap快一倍左右,同步的HashMap和Hashtable的性能相当。
原帖地址:http://www.java2000.net/p12427