Webpack4 性能优化实践 #108

简介: Webpack4 性能优化实践 #108

为什么需要性能优化


在使用 时,如果不注意性能优化,可能会产生性能问题,会导致在开发体验上不是非常丝滑,性能问题主要是编译速度慢,打包体积过大,因此性能优化也主要从这些方面来分析。本文主要是自己平时的工作积累和参考别人的文章,而进行总结,基于 版本。WebpackWebpack4


构建分析


编译速度分析

对 构建速度进行优化的首要任务就是去知道哪些地方值得我们注意。

插件能够测量 Webpack 构建速度Webpackspeed-measure-webpack-plugin

SMP  ⏱
General output time took 38.3 secs
 SMP  ⏱  Plugins
HtmlWebpackPlugin took 1.31 secs
CopyPlugin took 0.016 secs
OptimizeCssAssetsWebpackPlugin took 0.002 secs
ContextReplacementPlugin took 0.001 secs
MiniCssExtractPlugin took 0 secs
DefinePlugin took 0 secs
 SMP  ⏱  Loaders
_babel-loader@8.1.0@babel-loader took 29.98 secs
  module count = 1503
_babel-loader@8.1.0@babel-loader, and
_eslint-loader@3.0.4@eslint-loader took 18.74 secs
  module count = 86
_css-loader@3.6.0@css-loader, and
_less-loader@5.0.0@less-loader took 16.45 secs
  module count = 64
modules with no loaders took 2.24 secs
  module count = 7
_file-loader@5.1.0@file-loader took 1.03 secs
  module count = 17
_style-loader@1.3.0@style-loader, and
_css-loader@3.6.0@css-loader, and
_less-loader@5.0.0@less-loader took 0.102 secs
  module count = 64
_html-webpack-plugin@3.2.0@html-webpack-plugin took 0.021 secs
  module count = 1

居然达到了惊人的 38.3 秒,虽然有点不是很准确,但是非常慢。发现 占据了大头。babel-loader、eslint-loader、css-loader、less-loader

const webpackBase = require('./webpack.base.conf');
const path = require('path');
const SpeedMeasureWebpackPlugin = require('speed-measure-webpack-plugin');
const smp = new SpeedMeasureWebpackPlugin();
module.exports = smp.wrap({
    // 配置源码显示方式
    devtool: 'eval-source-map',
    mode: 'development',
    entry: {
        app: ['./src/index.jsx']
    },
    output: {
        path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
        filename: 'index.js'
    },
    resolve: webpackBase.resolve,
    module: webpackBase.module,
    stats: webpackBase.stats,
    optimization: webpackBase.optimization,
    plugins: [
        webpackBase.plugins.html,
        webpackBase.plugins.miniCssExtract,
        webpackBase.plugins.optimizeCssAssets,
        // webpackBase.plugins.progressBarPlugin,
        webpackBase.plugins.ContextReplacementPlugin,
        webpackBase.plugins.DefinePlugin,
        // webpackBase.plugins.AntdDayjsWebpackPlugin,
        webpackBase.plugins.CopyPlugin
        // webpackBase.plugins.HotModuleReplacementPlugin
    ],
    devServer: webpackBase.devServer,
    watchOptions: webpackBase.watchOptions,
    externals: webpackBase.externals
});


打包体积分析

通过 插件能够在 构建结束后生成构建产物体积报告,配合可视化的页面,能够直观知道产物中的具体占用体积。webpack-bundle-analyzerWebpack

const BundleAnalyzerPlugin = require('webpack-bundle-analyzer').BundleAnalyzerPlugin;
module.exports = {
  plugins: bundleAnalyzer: new BundleAnalyzerPlugin({ analyzerPort: 8081 })],
};

效果图如下:

可以看出一个很明显的问题就是 这些库,没有排除。Ant Design、TRTC、Mobx

打包体积如下:


如何优化


缩小构建目标

  • 优化 配置(减少模块搜索层级和不必要的编译工作)resolve.modules
  • 优化 配置resolve.extensions
  • 增加缓存
const path = require('path');
module.exports = {
    resolve: {
        // 自动解析确定的扩展
        extensions: ['.js', '.jsx', '.css', '.less', '.json'],
        alias: {
            // 创建 import 或 require 的别名,来确保模块引入变得更简单
            'react': path.resolve( __dirname ,'./node_modules/react/dist/react.min.js')
        },
        // 当从 npm 包导入模块时,此选项将决定在 `package.json` 中使用哪个字段导入模块
        // 默认值为 browser -> module -> main
        mainFields: ['main']
    },
    module: {
        rules: [
            {
                // 排除node_modules模块
                test: /\.(js|jsx)$/,
                exclude: /node_modules/,
                // 开启缓存
                loader: 'babel-loader?cacheDirectory=true'
            }
        ]
    }
};


使用 thread-loader,开启多进程

thread-loader 会将你的 放置在一个 池里面运行,每个 都是一个单独的有 600ms 限制的 进程。同时跨进程的数据交换也会被限制。请在高开销的 中使用,否则效果不佳。loaderworkerworkernode.jsloader

module.exports = {
  module: {
    rules: [
      {
        test: /\.js$/,
        include: path.resolve('src'),
        use: [
          'thread-loader',
          // your expensive loader (e.g babel-loader)
        ],
      },
    ],
  },
};


使用 hard-source-webpack-plugin

在 是 的更好替代者。Webpack4中,hard-source-webpack-pluginDLL

hard-source-webpack-plugin 是 的插件,为模块提供中间缓存步骤。为了查看结果,您需要使用此插件运行 两次:第一次构建将花费正常的时间。第二次构建将显着加快(大概提升 90% 的构建速度)。不过该插件很久没更新了,不太建议使用。WebpackWebpack


去掉 eslint-loader

由于我项目中使用了 如果配置了 ,其实可以去掉的。eslint-loaderprecommit


通过 externals 把相关的包,排除

Webpack

module.exports = {
    // externals 排除对应的包,注:排除掉的包必须要用script标签引入下
    externals: {
        react: 'React',
        'react-dom': 'ReactDOM',
        'trtc-js-sdk': 'TRTC',
        bizcharts: 'BizCharts',
        antd: 'antd',
        mobx: 'mobx',
        'mobx-react': 'mobxReact'
    }
};

index.html

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="zh">
    <head>
        <meta charset="utf-8" />
        <meta
            name="viewport"
            content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1, user-scalable=0"
        />
        <meta name="baidu-site-verification" content="ptk9VJudKz" />
        <link
            rel="stylesheet"
            href="https://xxx/antd.min3.26.20.css"
        />
        <title>webpack</title>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/17.0.0react.production.min.js"
        ></script>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/17.0.0react-dom.production.min.js"
        ></script>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/BizCharts3.5.8.js"
        ></script>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/trtc4.6.7.js"
        ></script>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/moment2.29.1.min.js"
        ></script>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/moment2.29.1zh-cn.js"
        ></script>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/polyfill.min7.8.0.js"
        ></script>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/antd.min3.26.20.js"
        ></script>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/mobx.umd.min5.13.1.js"
        ></script>
        <script
            type="text/javascript"
            src="https://xxx/mobx-react.index.min5.4.4.js"
        ></script>
    </head>
    <body>
        <div id="root"></div>
    </body>
</html>


JS 压缩

从 开始,默认情况下使用 是一款兼容 的 压缩器。与 (许多项目的早期标准)相比,它是面向未来的选择。有一个 的分支—— ,但由于它不再维护,于是就从这个分支诞生出了一个独立分支,它就是 。Webpack4terser压缩生产环境下的输出结果。TerserES2015 +JavaScriptUglifyJSUglifyJSuglify-esterser

const TerserPlugin = require('terser-webpack-plugin');
module.exports = {
    optimization: {
        minimizer: [
            // 压缩js
            new TerserPlugin({
                test: /\.(jsx|js)$/,
                extractComments: true,
                parallel: true,
                cache: true
            })
        ]
    },
};


CSS 压缩

Webpack 4.0 以后,官方推荐使用 插件来打包 文件。mini-css-extract-pluginCSS

const MiniCssExtractPlugin = require('mini-css-extract-plugin');
module.exports = {
    module: {
        rules: [
            {
                test: /\.(css|less)$/,
                use: [MiniCssExtractPlugin.loader]
            }
        ]
    },
};


FAQ


Ant Design 无法加载

请确保加载顺序, 放在 前面加载Moment、PolyfillAnt Design


MobX 无法加载

MobX 引入 需要引入mobx.umd.min.js库,mobx-react


package.json


{
    "name": "webpack",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "private": true,
    "main": "index.js",
    "dependencies": {
        "antd": "^3.26.20",
        "babel-eslint": "^10.0.3",
        "babel-loader": "^8.0.0",
        "babel-plugin-import": "^1.13.0",
        "babel-plugin-react-css-modules": "^5.2.6",
        "bizcharts": "^3.5.8",
        "china-division": "^2.3.1",
        "compression-webpack-plugin": "^3.0.1",
        "copy-webpack-plugin": "^5.1.1",
        "css-loader": "^3.2.0",
        "eslint": "^6.8.0",
        "eslint-config-prettier": "^6.11.0",
        "eslint-config-standard": "^14.1.0",
        "eslint-loader": "^3.0.4",
        "eslint-plugin-import": "^2.20.0",
        "eslint-plugin-promise": "^4.2.1",
        "eslint-plugin-react": "^7.17.0",
        "eslint-plugin-standard": "^4.0.1",
        "html-webpack-plugin": "^3.2.0",
        "less": "^3.8.1",
        "less-loader": "^5.0.0",
        "lint-staged": "^10.0.8",
        "mini-css-extract-plugin": "^0.8.0",
        "mobx": "^5.13.1",
        "mobx-react": "^5.4.4",
        "optimize-css-assets-webpack-plugin": "^5.0.1",
        "pre-commit": "^1.2.2",
        "progress-bar-webpack-plugin": "^1.12.1",
        "react": "^17.0.0",
        "react-dom": "^17.0.0",
        "speed-measure-webpack-plugin": "^1.3.1",
        "style-loader": "^1.2.1",
        "terser-webpack-plugin": "^2.2.1",
        "trtc-js-sdk": "^4.6.7",
        "viewerjs": "^1.5.0",
        "webpack": "^4.41.2",
        "webpack-bundle-analyzer": "^3.6.0",
        "webpack-cli": "^3.3.10",
        "webpack-dev-server": "^3.10.1"
    }
}


最终效果


打包体积:

打包体积由原先 2.1M 变成了 882KB,可以说效果非常巨大。

包依赖:

Ant Design、TRTC、Mobx 这些库也没了

编译速度:

SMP  ⏱
General output time took 10.67 secs
 SMP  ⏱  Plugins
HtmlWebpackPlugin took 1.69 secs
BundleAnalyzerPlugin took 0.091 secs
CopyPlugin took 0.011 secs
MiniCssExtractPlugin took 0.003 secs
OptimizeCssAssetsWebpackPlugin took 0.002 secs
DefinePlugin took 0.001 secs
ContextReplacementPlugin took 0 secs
 SMP  ⏱  Loaders
_babel-loader@8.1.0@babel-loader took 8.26 secs
  module count = 277
_babel-loader@8.1.0@babel-loader, and
_eslint-loader@3.0.4@eslint-loader took 7.18 secs
  module count = 86
_css-loader@3.6.0@css-loader, and
_less-loader@5.0.0@less-loader took 1.94 secs
  module count = 28
modules with no loaders took 0.728 secs
  module count = 12
_file-loader@5.1.0@file-loader took 0.392 secs
  module count = 17
_style-loader@1.3.0@style-loader, and
_css-loader@3.6.0@css-loader, and
_less-loader@5.0.0@less-loader took 0.052 secs
  module count = 28
_html-webpack-plugin@3.2.0@html-webpack-plugin took 0.026 secs
  module count = 1

编译速度由原先 38.3 秒(实际编译速度大概 15 秒左右),减少到 10.67 秒(实际编译速度 10 秒左右)。


国内外公共 CDN 地址


参考资料


目录
相关文章
|
7月前
|
前端开发
构建工具对比:Webpack与Rollup的前端工程化实践
在现代前端开发中,前端工程化变得愈发重要。本文将对两个常用的构建工具——Webpack和Rollup进行比较,探讨它们在前端工程化实践中的特点、优势和适用场景。无论是大型应用的打包优化还是轻量级库的构建,选择适合的构建工具都能提高开发效率和项目性能。
143 1
|
1月前
|
前端开发 JavaScript
手敲Webpack 5:React + TypeScript项目脚手架搭建实践
手敲Webpack 5:React + TypeScript项目脚手架搭建实践
|
2月前
|
前端开发 JavaScript 开发者
构建工具对比:Webpack与Rollup的前端工程化实践
【10月更文挑战第11天】本文对比了前端构建工具Webpack和Rollup,探讨了它们在模块打包、资源配置、构建速度等方面的异同。通过具体示例,展示了两者的基本配置和使用方法,帮助开发者根据项目需求选择合适的工具。
28 3
|
2月前
|
缓存 前端开发 JavaScript
Webpack技术深度解析:模块打包与性能优化
【10月更文挑战第13天】Webpack技术深度解析:模块打包与性能优化
|
5月前
|
缓存 JSON 前端开发
Webpack打包优化实践
【7月更文挑战第17天】Webpack的打包优化是一个持续的过程,需要开发者根据项目的实际情况选择合适的优化策略。通过拆分代码、压缩代码、使用Tree Shaking、优化加载器配置、利用缓存以及进行性能分析,我们可以有效提升Webpack的打包效率和应用的加载
|
7月前
|
缓存 资源调度 监控
Webpack 5新特性详解与性能优化实践
Webpack 5通过确定性的Chunk ID、模块ID和导出ID实现了长期缓存,这意味着相同的输入将始终产生相同的输出。这样,当你的用户再次访问更新后的网站时,浏览器可以重用旧的缓存,而不是重新下载所有资源。
93 2
|
7月前
|
前端开发 UED
探索前端工程化之路:Webpack、Rollup等构建工具对比与实践
在现代前端开发中,工程化成为不可或缺的一环。本文将深入探讨常用的前端构建工具Webpack和Rollup,并比较它们在实践中的优劣势。通过对功能、性能、插件生态等方面的评估,帮助读者选择适合自己项目需求的构建工具。
97 1
|
7月前
|
缓存 监控 JavaScript
《Webpack5 核心原理与应用实践》学习笔记-> webpack极致性能优化
《Webpack5 核心原理与应用实践》学习笔记-> webpack极致性能优化
87 1
|
7月前
|
监控 IDE 开发工具
《Webpack5 核心原理与应用实践》学习笔记-> webpack性能优化技巧
《Webpack5 核心原理与应用实践》学习笔记-> webpack性能优化技巧
129 0
|
缓存 前端开发 JavaScript
webpack性能优化
webpack 性能优化
下一篇
DataWorks